[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: Supporting ~10K users on ZFS

2006-06-30 Thread Steve Bennett
Eric said: > Each filesystem holding onto memory (unnecessarily if > no one is using that filesystem) is something we're thinking > about changing. OK - glad to hear that it's already been acknowledged as an issue! > Right - NFSv4 allows client's to cross filesystem boundaries. > Trond just recen

[zfs-discuss] Re: Re: Supporting ~10K users on ZFS

2006-06-30 Thread Steve Bennett
> How did you measure it? (I'm not saying it doesn't > take those 45kB - just I haven't checked it myself > and I wonder how you checked it). ran 'top', looked at 'mem free' created 1000 filesystems ran 'top' again. rebooted to be sure ran 'top' again I'm sure I should use something better than t

[zfs-discuss] Re: Supporting ~10K users on ZFS

2006-06-29 Thread Steve Bennett
> There is no 40 filesystem limit. You most likely had a pre-existing > file/directory in testpool of the same name of the filesystem > you tried to create. I'm absolutely sure that I didn't. This was a freshly created pool. Having said that, I recreated the pool just now and tried again and it

[zfs-discuss] Supporting ~10K users on ZFS

2006-06-27 Thread Steve Bennett
ack of 'legacy' user-based quotas make it impractical. If the ZFS developers really are not going to implement user quotas is there any advice on what someone like me could do - at the moment I'm presuming that I'll just have to leave