[zfs-discuss] Re: Clones and rm -rf

2006-08-03 Thread Tom Simpson
Well, You're spot on. Turns out that our datacentre boys change the umask of root to 0027. :-( This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org

[zfs-discuss] Re: Clones and rm -rf

2006-08-02 Thread Tom Simpson
Actually, just tried this on a non-cloned filesystem with the same results. I can't believe there is a bug with rm -rf, so is this something to do with ACLs ? Help! Tom This message posted from opensolaris.org ___ zfs-discuss mailing list

[zfs-discuss] Re: Clones and rm -rf

2006-08-02 Thread Tom Simpson
I'm not at the machine to check at the moment, but I didn't create the /u05 mountpoint manually. ZFS created it automatically when I did :- % zfs set mountpoint=/u05 zfspool/u05 You would hope that ZFS didn't get the underlying permissions wrong! This message posted from opensolaris.org