On 29/11/06, Dick Davies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 28/11/06, Terence Patrick Donoghue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a difference - Yep,
>
> 'legacy' tells ZFS to refer to the /etc/vfstab file for FS mounts and
> options
> whereas
> 'none' tells ZFS not to mount the ZFS filesystem at a
On 28/11/06, Terence Patrick Donoghue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there a difference - Yep,
'legacy' tells ZFS to refer to the /etc/vfstab file for FS mounts and
options
whereas
'none' tells ZFS not to mount the ZFS filesystem at all. Then you would
need to manually mount the ZFS using 'zfs se
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 11:13:02AM -0800, Eric Schrock wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 06:06:24PM +, Ceri Davies wrote:
> >
> > But you could presumably get that exact effect by not listing a
> > filesystem in /etc/vfstab.
> >
>
> Yes, but someone could still manually mount the filesystem u
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 06:06:24PM +, Ceri Davies wrote:
>
> But you could presumably get that exact effect by not listing a
> filesystem in /etc/vfstab.
>
Yes, but someone could still manually mount the filesystem using 'mount
-F zfs ...'. If you set the mountpoint to 'none', then it canno
On Tue, Nov 28, 2006 at 06:08:23PM +0100, Terence Patrick Donoghue wrote:
> Dick Davies wrote On 11/28/06 17:15,:
>
> >Is there a difference between setting mountpoint=legacy and
> >mountpoint=none?
> Is there a difference - Yep,
>
> 'legacy' tells ZFS to refer to the /etc/vfstab file for FS mo
Is there a difference - Yep,
'legacy' tells ZFS to refer to the /etc/vfstab file for FS mounts and
options
whereas
'none' tells ZFS not to mount the ZFS filesystem at all. Then you would
need to manually mount the ZFS using 'zfs set mountpoint=/mountpoint
poolname/fsname' to get it mounted.
Is there a difference between setting mountpoint=legacy and mountpoint=none?
--
Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns
http://number9.hellooperator.net/
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailma
