On 8/7/06, Adam Leventhal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Needless to say, this was a pretty interesting piece of the keynote from a
technical point of view that had quite a few of us scratching our heads.
After talking to some Apple engineers, it seems like what they're doing is
more or less this:
On Aug 8, 2006, at 12:34 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Adam Leventhal wrote:
Needless to say, this was a pretty interesting piece of the
keynote from a
technical point of view that had quite a few of us scratching our
heads.
After talking to some Apple engineers, it seems like what they're
Bryan Cantrill wrote:
So in short (and brace yourself, because I
know it will be a shock): mentions by executives in keynotes don't always
accurately represent a technology. DynFS, anyone? ;)
I'm shocked and stunned, and not a little amazed!
I'll bet the OpenSolaris PPC guys are thrilled
On August 8, 2006 3:04:09 PM +0930 Darren J Moffat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adam Leventhal wrote:
When a file is modified, the kernel fires off an event which a user-land
daemon listens for. Every so often, the user-land daemon does something
like a snapshot of the affected portions of the
I am reading the live coverage of WWDC keynote here:http://www.macrumorslive.com/web/They talked about a new feature in OS X/Leopard: Time Machine.
Does it sound like instant snapshot and rollback to you?I don't know how else this can be implemented.10:37 am with time machine, you can get those
they
just made snapshots accesible to desktop users. Pretty impressive how they did
the GUI work too.
- Original Message -
From: Eric Schrock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, August 7, 2006 8:55 am
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Apple Time Machine
To: Tao Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ZFS Discussions
impressive how they did the GUI work too.
- Original Message -
From: Eric Schrock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, August 7, 2006 8:55 am
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Apple Time Machine
To: Tao Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: ZFS Discussions zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
There are some more
+ or if they actually migrated to ZFS. The next weeks should
be interesting as people get ahold of the dev copies.
David
- Original Message -
From: Joseph Mocker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Monday, August 7, 2006 9:04 am
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Apple Time Machine
To: David J. Orman [EMAIL PROTECTED
Yeah, I just noticed this line:
Backup Time: Time Machine will back up every night at midnight, unless
you select a different time from this menu.
So this is just standard backups, with a (very) slick GUI layered on
top. From the impression of the text-only rumor feed, it sounded more
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 12:08:17PM -0700, Eric Schrock wrote:
Yeah, I just noticed this line:
Backup Time: Time Machine will back up every night at midnight, unless
you select a different time from this menu.
So this is just standard backups, with a (very) slick GUI layered on
top. From
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 02:36:27PM -0500, Ed Plese wrote:
A quick Google search turned up the following URL which has some
screenshots to illustrate what the Shadow Copy Client looks like.
Oops.. forgot the URL:
http://www.petri.co.il/how_to_use_the_shadow_copy_client.htm
Ed Plese
Eric Schrock wrote:
So this is just standard backups, with a (very) slick GUI layered on
top.
http://blogs.sun.com/roller/page/timf?entry=zfs_on_your_desktop
vs.
http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/timemachine.html
Hey!! Their idea looks *awfully* familiar :-/
(Steve, does this mean you'll
On 8/7/06, Tim Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Magda wrote: Well, they've ported Dtrace: ..now built into Mac OS X Leopard. Xray. Because it's 2006.Uh right and they're actually shipping it in 2007. Apple marketing.
Anyone want to start printing t-shirts:DTrace Time Machine in OpenSolaris.
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:19:14PM -1000, David J. Orman wrote:
(actually did they give OpenSolaris a name check at all when they
mentioned DTrace ?)
Nope, not that I can see. Apple's pretty notorious for that kind of
oversight. I used to work for them, I know first hand how
On 8/7/06, Eric Schrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:19:14PM -1000, David J. Orman wrote: (actually did they give OpenSolaris a name check at all when they mentioned DTrace ?) Nope, not that I can see. Apple's pretty notorious for that kind of
oversight. I used to work
On Aug 7, 2006, at 7:17 PM, Tao Chen wrote:
In terms of openness, Sun and Apple are going opposite directions
IMHO, interesting situation :)
Tao
Apple just released the Darwin Kernel code xnu-792-10.96
the equivalent of 10.4.7 for intel machines.
-- Robert.
Apple just released the Darwin Kernel code xnu-792-10.96
the equivalent of 10.4.7 for intel machines.
-- Robert.
Really? How odd. Seems to be counter-intuitive with this news:
http://opendarwin.org/en/news/shutdown.html
___
zfs-discuss mailing
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 04:57:44PM -0700, Eric Schrock wrote:
On Mon, Aug 07, 2006 at 01:19:14PM -1000, David J. Orman wrote:
(actually did they give OpenSolaris a name check at all when they
mentioned DTrace ?)
Nope, not that I can see. Apple's pretty notorious for that kind of
Needless to say, this was a pretty interesting piece of the keynote from a
technical point of view that had quite a few of us scratching our heads.
After talking to some Apple engineers, it seems like what they're doing is
more or less this:
When a file is modified, the kernel fires off an event
On 8/7/06, Robert Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 7, 2006, at 7:17 PM, Tao Chen wrote: In terms of openness, Sun and Apple are going opposite directions IMHO, interesting situation :) TaoApple just released the Darwin Kernel code
xnu-792-10.96the equivalent of 10.4.7 for intel machines.--
On 8/7/06, Bryan Cantrill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've had a great relationship with Apple at the engineering level -- andindeed, Team DTrace just got back from dinner with the Apple engineersinvolved with the port.More details here:
Adam Leventhal wrote:
Needless to say, this was a pretty interesting piece of the keynote from a
technical point of view that had quite a few of us scratching our heads.
After talking to some Apple engineers, it seems like what they're doing is
more or less this:
When a file is modified, the
22 matches
Mail list logo
