Re: [zfs-discuss] Backport of vfs_zfsacl.c to samba 3.0.26a

2007-11-03 Thread Tomasz Torcz
On 11/2/07, Carson Gaspar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As 3.2.0 isn't released yet, and I didn't want to wait, I've backported > vfs_zfsacl.c from SAMBA_3_2. What about licenses? (L)GPLv2/v3 compatibility? -- Tomasz Torcz [EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ zfs-disc

Re: [zfs-discuss] Backport of vfs_zfsacl.c to samba 3.0.26a, [and NexentaStor]

2007-11-02 Thread Joe Little
On 11/2/07, Rob Logan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm confused by this and NexentaStor... wouldn't it be better > to use b77? with: > > Heads Up: File system framework changes (supplement to CIFS' "head's up") > Heads Up: Flag Day (Addendum) (CIFS Service) > Heads Up: Flag Day (CIFS Service) > c

Re: [zfs-discuss] Backport of vfs_zfsacl.c to samba 3.0.26a, [and NexentaStor]

2007-11-02 Thread Rob Logan
I'm confused by this and NexentaStor... wouldn't it be better to use b77? with: Heads Up: File system framework changes (supplement to CIFS' "head's up") Heads Up: Flag Day (Addendum) (CIFS Service) Heads Up: Flag Day (CIFS Service) caller_context_t in all VOPs - PSARC/2007/218 VFS Feature Regist

[zfs-discuss] Backport of vfs_zfsacl.c to samba 3.0.26a

2007-11-02 Thread Carson Gaspar
As 3.2.0 isn't released yet, and I didn't want to wait, I've backported vfs_zfsacl.c from SAMBA_3_2. You can grab the patch from http://taltos.dreamhosters.com/samba-3.0.26a.zfs.patch if interested. It all appears to work, although Vista complains about ACL ordering. -- Carson ___