Re: [zfs-discuss] COW question

2011-05-10 Thread Francois Marcoux
przemol...@poczta.fm wrote: >On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 11:59:29AM +0800, Raymond Xiong wrote: > > >>It doesn't. Page 11 of the following slides illustrates how COW >>works in ZFS: >> >>http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/docs/zfs_last.pdf >> >>"Blocks containing active data are never over

Re: [zfs-discuss] COW question

2006-07-12 Thread Nathan Kroenert
I think the other part of information that's missing is that we COW at the block level, NOT at the file level. So, the extra blocks are in use only during the update, and it's only blocks, not whole files... Hope this helps.. Nathan. On Thu, 2006-07-13 at 14:10, Chad Lewis wrote: > It uses ext

Re: [zfs-discuss] COW question

2006-07-12 Thread Chad Lewis
It uses extra space in the middle of the write, in order to hold the new data, but once the write is complete, the space occupied by the old version is now free for use. ckl On Jul 12, 2006, at 8:05 PM, Robert Chen wrote: I still could not understand why Copy on Write does not waste file

Re: [zfs-discuss] COW question

2006-07-12 Thread Robert Chen
I still could not understand why Copy on Write does not waste file system capacity. Robert Raymond Xiong 写道: Robert Chen wrote: question is ZFS uses COW(copy on write), does this mean it will double usage of capacity or waste the capacity? What COW really do? No mirror also has

Re: [zfs-discuss] COW question

2006-07-07 Thread Francois Marcoux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 11:59:29AM +0800, Raymond Xiong wrote: It doesn't. Page 11 of the following slides illustrates how COW works in ZFS: http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/docs/zfs_last.pdf "Blocks containing active data are never overwritten in place

Re: [zfs-discuss] COW question

2006-07-07 Thread przemolicc
On Fri, Jul 07, 2006 at 11:59:29AM +0800, Raymond Xiong wrote: > It doesn't. Page 11 of the following slides illustrates how COW > works in ZFS: > > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/zfs/docs/zfs_last.pdf > > "Blocks containing active data are never overwritten in place; > instead, a new bl

Re: [zfs-discuss] COW question

2006-07-06 Thread Raymond Xiong
Robert Chen wrote: > question is ZFS uses COW(copy on write), does this mean it will > double usage of capacity or waste the capacity? > > What COW really do? No mirror also has COW? > > Please help me, thanks. > > Robert > > ___ > zfs-discuss mailing lis

[zfs-discuss] COW question

2006-07-06 Thread Robert Chen
question is ZFS uses COW(copy on write), does this mean it will double usage of capacity or waste the capacity? What COW really do? No mirror also has COW? Please help me, thanks. Robert ___ zfs-discuss mailing list zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org http://