Re: [zfs-discuss] DMU corruption

2007-06-30 Thread Peter Bortas
On 6/30/07, Matthew Ahrens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Peter Bortas wrote: > According to the zdb dump, object 0 seems to be the DMU node on each > file system. My understanding of this part of ZFS is very shallow, but > why does it allow the filesystems to be mounted rw with damaged DMU > nodes,

Re: [zfs-discuss] DMU corruption

2007-06-30 Thread Matthew Ahrens
Peter Bortas wrote: According to the zdb dump, object 0 seems to be the DMU node on each file system. My understanding of this part of ZFS is very shallow, but why does it allow the filesystems to be mounted rw with damaged DMU nodes, doesn't that result in a risk of more permanent damage to the

[zfs-discuss] DMU corruption

2007-06-30 Thread Peter Bortas
Hello all, After playing around a bit with the disks (powering down, pulling one disk out, powering down putting the disk back in and pulling out another one, repeat) zpool status reports permanent data corruption: # uname -a SunOS bhelliom 5.11 snv_55b i86pc i386 i86pc # zpool status -v pool: