Hi Bill,
Thinking about this a little more, would this provide the ability to
maintain B and G's data for a rollback followed by a possible roll
forward?
1.) Create a clone of snapshot_B (clone_B).
2.) Create a new current snapshot (snapshot_F).
3.) Create a clone of snapshot_F (clone_F).
4.) Pr
Hi Bill,
You've got it 99%. I want to roll E back to say B, and keep G intact.
I really don't care about C, D or F. Essentially, B is where I want to
roll back to, but in case B's data copy doesn't improve what I'm
trying to fix I want to have copy of G's data around so I can go back
to how it.
M
I may not be understanding your usage case correctly, so bear with me.
Here is what I understand your request to be. Time is increasing from
left to right.
A -- B -- C -- D -- E
\
- F -- G
Where E and G are writable filesystems and the others are snapshots.
I think y
Hey Guys,
Its not possible yet to fracture a snapshot or clone into a
self-standing filesystem is it? Basically, I'd like to fracture a
snapshot/clone into is own FS so I can rollback past that snapshot in
the original filesystem and still keep that data.
Thank you in advance.
Best Regards,
Jaso
