On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 09:41:12AM +0100, Andrew Robert Nicols wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 08:31:54PM +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
> > Andrew Robert Nicols wrote:
> >
> >> The thumper unning 112 has continued to experience the issues described by
> >> Ian and others. I've just upgraded to 117 and
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 08:31:54PM +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
> Andrew Robert Nicols wrote:
>
>> The thumper unning 112 has continued to experience the issues described by
>> Ian and others. I've just upgraded to 117 and am having even more issues -
>> I'm unable to receive or roll back snapshots, i
Andrew Robert Nicols wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 08:43:17AM +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
Brent Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
I was doing an incremental send between pools, the rec
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 08:43:17AM +1200, Ian Collins wrote:
> Ian Collins wrote:
>> Brent Jones wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
>>>
Ian Collins wrote:
> I was doing an incremental send between pools, the receive side is
> locked up and no zfs/z
Ian Collins wrote:
Brent Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
I was doing an incremental send between pools, the receive side is
locked
up and no zfs/zpool commands work on that pool.
The stacks look different from those reported in the ear
Brent Jones wrote:
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
Ian Collins wrote:
I was doing an incremental send between pools, the receive side is locked
up and no zfs/zpool commands work on that pool.
The stacks look different from those reported in the earlier "ZFS snapshot
On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 8:31 PM, Ian Collins wrote:
> Ian Collins wrote:
>>
>> I was doing an incremental send between pools, the receive side is locked
>> up and no zfs/zpool commands work on that pool.
>>
>> The stacks look different from those reported in the earlier "ZFS snapshot
>> send/recv "h
Ian Collins wrote:
I was doing an incremental send between pools, the receive side is
locked up and no zfs/zpool commands work on that pool.
The stacks look different from those reported in the earlier "ZFS
snapshot send/recv "hangs" X4540 servers" thread.
Here is the process information fro
I was doing an incremental send between pools, the receive side is
locked up and no zfs/zpool commands work on that pool.
The stacks look different from those reported in the earlier "ZFS
snapshot send/recv "hangs" X4540 servers" thread.
Here is the process information from scat (other comman
