Hello mike,
Friday, January 19, 2007, 4:07:31 AM, you wrote:
m I get that part. I think I asked that question before (although not as
m direct) - basically you're talking about the ability to shrink volumes
m and/or disable/change the mirroring/redundancy options if there is
m space available to
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 06:55:39PM +0800, Jeremy Teo wrote:
On the issue of the ability to remove a device from a zpool, how
useful/pressing is this feature? Or is this more along the line of
nice to have?
We definitely need it. As a usage case, on occasion we have had to move
SAN sites, and
On the issue of the ability to remove a device from a zpool, how
useful/pressing is this feature? Or is this more along the line of
nice to have?
--
Regards,
Jeremy
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
On Thu, Jan 18, 2007 at 06:55:39PM +0800, Jeremy Teo wrote:
On the issue of the ability to remove a device from a zpool, how
useful/pressing is this feature? Or is this more along the line of
nice to have?
If you think remove a device from a zpool = to shrink a pool then
it is really usefull.
On 18/01/07, Jeremy Teo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the issue of the ability to remove a device from a zpool, how
useful/pressing is this feature? Or is this more along the line of
nice to have?
It's very useful if you accidentally create a concat rather than mirror
of an existing zpool.
On 18/01/2007, at 9:55 PM, Jeremy Teo wrote:
On the issue of the ability to remove a device from a zpool, how
useful/pressing is this feature? Or is this more along the line of
nice to have?
Assuming we're talking about removing a top-level vdev..
I introduce new sysadmins to ZFS on a weekly
Jeremy Teo wrote:
On the issue of the ability to remove a device from a zpool, how
useful/pressing is this feature? Or is this more along the line of
nice to have?
This is a pretty high priority. We are working on it.
--matt
___
zfs-discuss mailing
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 10:51 -0800, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
Jeremy Teo wrote:
On the issue of the ability to remove a device from a zpool, how
useful/pressing is this feature? Or is this more along the line of
nice to have?
This is a pretty high priority. We are working on it.
--matt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 01/18/2007 01:29:23 PM:
On Thu, 2007-01-18 at 10:51 -0800, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
Jeremy Teo wrote:
On the issue of the ability to remove a device from a zpool, how
useful/pressing is this feature? Or is this more along the line of
nice to have?
Would this be the same as failing a drive on purpose to remove it?
I was under the impression that was supported, but I wasn't sure if
shrinking a ZFS pool would work though.
On 1/18/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is a pretty high priority. We are working on it.
10 matches
Mail list logo
