[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> For ufs "ufsdump | ufsrestore" I have found that I prefer the buffer on the
> receive side, but it should be much bigger. ufsrestore starts with
> creating all directories and that is SLOW.
This is why copying filesystems via star is much faster:
- There is no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> In my experimentation (using my own buffer program), it's the receive
>> side buffering you need. The size of the buffer needs to be large enough
>> to hold 5 seconds worth of data. How much data/second you get will
>> depend on which part of your system is the l
>In my experimentation (using my own buffer program), it's the receive
>side buffering you need. The size of the buffer needs to be large enough
>to hold 5 seconds worth of data. How much data/second you get will
>depend on which part of your system is the limiting factor. In my case,
>with 7
Thomas Maier-Komor wrote:
> First start the receive side, then the sender side:
>
> receiver> mbuffer -s 128k -m 200M -I sender:8000 | zfs receive filesystem
>
> sender> zfs send pool/filesystem | mbuffer -s 128k -m 200M -O receiver:8000
>
> Of course, you should adjust the hostnames accordingly, a
Julius Roberts wrote:
>>> How do i compile mbuffer for our system,
>
> Thanks to Mike Futerko for help with the compile, i now have it installed OK.
>
>>> and what syntax to i use to invoke it within the zfs send recv?
>
> Still looking for answers to this one? Any example syntax, gotchas
> et
>> How do i compile mbuffer for our system,
Thanks to Mike Futerko for help with the compile, i now have it installed OK.
>> and what syntax to i use to invoke it within the zfs send recv?
Still looking for answers to this one? Any example syntax, gotchas
etc would be much appreciated.
--
Ki
