upgraded to U9.
--
Holger Isenberg
e-Spirit AG
> -Original Message-
> From: erik.trim...@sun.com [mailto:erik.trim...@sun.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 3:56 PM
> To: Isenberg, Holger
> Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] Huge difference in r
Thanks for the fast response!
Rsync is used on modified old files and some of the large files are not
modified at all. Complete new files are only created every few weeks.
One example for a typical leaf directory:
bash-3.00# ls -gh
/export/archiv/VMs/rsync/esx2/486e1c33-e7780ff3-fea1-00e081467
That was very comprehensive, Holger. Thanks.
Unfortunately, I don't see anything that would explain the discrepancy.
When you do the rsync to this machine, are you simply rsync'ing a fresh
image file (that is, creating a new file that doesn't exist, not
updating an existing image)?
-Erik
There are no snapshots on those filesystems, that's I'm wondering about. I'm
using snapshots on another Solaris system on a different hardware not connected
to this one. And the 3 snapshots on this systems are only rarely created and
not within the two huge filesystems mentioned above.
And spar
Holger Isenberg wrote:
I already have looked into that, but there are no snapshots or small files on
that filesystem.
It is used only as target for rsync to store few very large files which are
written or updated once a week.
Also note the huge difference between the filesystem written by cp
I already have looked into that, but there are no snapshots or small files on
that filesystem.
It is used only as target for rsync to store few very large files which are
written or updated once a week.
Also note the huge difference between the filesystem written by cp over NFS
and the one wit
