On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 4:17 AM, Andrew Gabriel andrew.gabr...@sun.comwrote:
Actually, this sounds like really good news for ZFS.
ZFS (or rather, Solaris) can make good use of the multi-pathing capability,
only previously available on high speed drives.
Of course, ZFS can make use of any
@opensolaris.org
Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2010 8:06 AM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] NearLine SAS?
Tim Cook wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@sun.com
mailto:erik.trim...@sun.com wrote:
A poster in another forum mentioned that Seagate (and Hitachi,
amongst
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 01:02 PM, A. Krijgsman a.krijgs...@draftsman.nl wrote:
I was today reasearching this same phenomenon.
The multipath is required for HA storage solutions with redundant i/o path
backplanes and redundant controllers.
( If a controller fails, the other one can still access
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 01:36 PM, A. Krijgsman a.krijgs...@draftsman.nl wrote:
Yes, those i meant! (interposer cards, could get on that name!)
The Dell's and HP's would al work in any enviroment?
It's just plain converting between industry standards right?
Or do people have a better
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@sun.com wrote:
A poster in another forum mentioned that Seagate (and Hitachi, amongst
others) is now selling something labeled as NearLine SAS storage (e.g.
Seagate's NL35 series).
Is it me, or does this look like nothing more than
Tim Cook wrote:
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:16 AM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@sun.com
mailto:erik.trim...@sun.com wrote:
A poster in another forum mentioned that Seagate (and Hitachi,
amongst others) is now selling something labeled as NearLine SAS
storage (e.g. Seagate's NL35
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 1:06 AM, Erik Trimble erik.trim...@sun.com wrote:
stupid question here: I understand the advantages of dual-porting a drive
with a FC interface, but for SAS, exactly what are the advantages other than
being able to read and write simultaneously (obviously, only from
