Jim,
They are running Solaris 10 11/06 (u3) with kernel patch 142900-12. See
inline for the rest...
On 10/25/10 11:19 AM, Jim Mauro wrote:
Hi Jim - cross-posting to zfs-discuss, because 20X is, to say the
least, compelling.
Obviously, it would be awesome if we had the opportunity to
This combination of tunables is probably a worst case set for doing
sequential or multi-block reads, particularly from a COW file system.
We know that disaggregation can occur due to small, random writes,
and that this can result in an increase in IOPS required to do
sequential or multi-block
Hi Jim - cross-posting to zfs-discuss, because 20X is, to say the least,
compelling.
Obviously, it would be awesome if we had the opportunity to whittle-down which
of
the changes made this fly, or if it was a combination of the changes.
Looking at them individually
set
There is nothing in here that requires zfs confidential.
cross-posted to zfs discuss.
On Oct 21, 2010, at 3:37 PM, Jim Nissen wrote:
Cross-posting.
Original Message
Subject: Performance problems due to smaller ZFS recordsize
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2010 14:00:42 -0500
