On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> OK, so I made progress today. FreeBSD see's all of my drives, ZFS is acting
> correct.
>
> Now for me confusion.
>
> RAIDz3
>
> # zpool create datastore raidz3 da0 da1 da2 da3 da4 da5 da6 da7
> Gives: 'raidz3' no such GEOM providor
>
>
FreeB
On Mar 26, 2010, at 23:37, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
On Fri, March 26, 2010 14:25, Malte Schirmacher wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Except that ZFS does not support RAID0. I don't know why you guys
persist with these absurd claims and continue to use wrong and
misleading terminology.
What
command twice for da6 and da7?
>
> -Jason
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Slack-Moehrle"
> To: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 12:13:58 PM
> Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] RAID10
>
>
>
> >> Can someone explain in te
s.org
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 12:13:58 PM
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] RAID10
>> Can someone explain in terms of usable space RAIDZ vs RAIDZ2 vs RAIDZ3? With
>> 8 x 1.5tb?
>> I apologize for seeming dense, I just am confused about non-stardard raid
>> setups, they
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Freddie Cash wrote:
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
wrote:
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Freddie Cash wrote:
Overly-simplified, a ZFS pool is a RAID0 stripeset across all the
member
vdevs, which can be
Except that ZFS does no
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
The question was essentially "Wait, I don't see RAID 10 here, and that's
what I like. How do I do that?" I think the answer was responsive and
not misleading enough to be dangerous; the differences can be explicated
later.
Most of us choose a poo
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Malte Schirmacher wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
Except that ZFS does not support RAID0. I don't know why you guys
persist with these absurd claims and continue to use wrong and
misleading terminology.
What is the main difference between RAID0 and striping (what zfs real
It depends a bit on how you set up the drives really. You could make one raidz
vdev of 8 drives, losing one of them for parity, or you could make two raidz
vdevs of 4 drives each and lose two drives for parity (one for each vdev). You
could also do one raidz2 vdev of 8 drives and lose two driv
On Fri, March 26, 2010 14:25, Malte Schirmacher wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
>> Except that ZFS does not support RAID0. I don't know why you guys
>> persist with these absurd claims and continue to use wrong and
>> misleading terminology.
>
> What is the main difference between RAID0 and str
On Fri, March 26, 2010 14:21, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Freddie Cash wrote:
>>
>> Overly-simplified, a ZFS pool is a RAID0 stripeset across all the member
>> vdevs, which can be
>
> Except that ZFS does not support RAID0. I don't know why you guys
> persist with these absurd c
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Bob Friesenhahn <
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Freddie Cash wrote:
>
>>
>> Overly-simplified, a ZFS pool is a RAID0 stripeset across all the member
>> vdevs, which can be
>>
>
> Except that ZFS does not support RAID0.
Wow, what par
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 12:25:54PM -0700, Malte Schirmacher wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
> > Except that ZFS does not support RAID0. I don't know why you guys
> > persist with these absurd claims and continue to use wrong and
> > misleading terminology.
>
> What is the main difference betwe
Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> Except that ZFS does not support RAID0. I don't know why you guys
> persist with these absurd claims and continue to use wrong and
> misleading terminology.
What is the main difference between RAID0 and striping (what zfs really
does, i guess?)
_
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Freddie Cash wrote:
Overly-simplified, a ZFS pool is a RAID0 stripeset across all the member vdevs,
which can be
Except that ZFS does not support RAID0. I don't know why you guys
persist with these absurd claims and continue to use wrong and
misleading terminology.
W
>> Can someone explain in terms of usable space RAIDZ vs RAIDZ2 vs RAIDZ3? With
>> 8 x 1.5tb?
>> I apologize for seeming dense, I just am confused about non-stardard raid
>> setups, they seem tricky.
> raidz "eats" one disk. Like RAID5
> raidz2 digests another one. Like RAID6
> raidz3 yet an
] On Behalf Of Slack-Moehrle
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 12:04 PM
To: Tim Cook
Cc: zfs-discuss
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] RAID10
>>So if I have 8 x 1.5tb drives, wouldn't I:
>>- mirror drive 1 and 5
>>- mirror drive 2 and 6
>>- mirror drive 3 and 7
>>- m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26.03.2010 20:04, Slack-Moehrle wrote:
>
>
>>> So if I have 8 x 1.5tb drives, wouldn't I:
>
>>> - mirror drive 1 and 5
>>> - mirror drive 2 and 6
>>> - mirror drive 3 and 7
>>> - mirror drive 4 and 8
>
>>> Then stripe 1,2,3,4
>
>>> Then s
>>So if I have 8 x 1.5tb drives, wouldn't I:
>>- mirror drive 1 and 5
>>- mirror drive 2 and 6
>>- mirror drive 3 and 7
>>- mirror drive 4 and 8
>>Then stripe 1,2,3,4
>>Then stripe 5,6,7,8
>>How does one do this with ZFS?
>So you would do:
>zpool create tank mirror drive1 drive2 mir
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Slack-Moehrle <
mailingli...@mailnewsrss.com> wrote:
> I am looking at ZFS and I get that they call it RAIDZ which is similar to
> RAID 5, but what about RAID 10? Isn't a RAID 10 setup better for data
> protection?
>
> So if I have 8 x 1.5tb drives, wouldn't I:
>
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am looking at ZFS and I get that they call it RAIDZ which is
> similar to RAID 5, but what about RAID 10? Isn't a RAID 10 setup better
> for data protection?
I think so--at the expense of extra disks for a given amount of available
storag
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Slack-Moehrle wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I am looking at ZFS and I get that they call it RAIDZ which is similar to
> RAID 5, but what about RAID 10? Isn't a RAID 10 setup better for data
> protection?
>
> So if I have 8 x 1.5tb drives, wouldn't I:
>
> - mirror drive 1 a
:35 AM
Subject: [zfs-discuss] RAID10
Hi All,
I am looking at ZFS and I get that they call it RAIDZ which is similar to RAID
5, but what about RAID 10? Isn't a RAID 10 setup better for data protection?
So if I have 8 x 1.5tb drives, wouldn't I:
- mirror drive 1 and 5
- mirror drive
And I should mention that I have a boot drive (500gb SATA) so I dont have to
consider booting from the RAID, I just want to use it for storage.
- Original Message -
From: "Slack-Moehrle"
To: "zfs-discuss"
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 11:39:35 AM
Subject: [zfs-dis
Hi All,
I am looking at ZFS and I get that they call it RAIDZ which is similar to RAID
5, but what about RAID 10? Isn't a RAID 10 setup better for data protection?
So if I have 8 x 1.5tb drives, wouldn't I:
- mirror drive 1 and 5
- mirror drive 2 and 6
- mirror drive 3 and 7
- mirror drive 4 an
24 matches
Mail list logo
