> 2. ZFS doesn't make much sense for high-performance laptops. Laptop drives
> are slow enough without artificially increasing the number of seeks on
> writes. Apple makes a LOT of money from laptops. It's also unclear how well
> ZFS would play with other latency- and CPU-sensitive applicatio
>And the posts related to leopard handed out at wwdc 07 seems to
>indicate that zfs is not yet fully implemented, which might be the
>real reason that zfs isn't the default fs.
I suspect there are two other strong reasons why it's not the default.
1. ZFS is a new and immature file system. HFS+ h
