On 12/29/06, Eric Schrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 11:23:30PM +0100, Holger Berger wrote:
So the goal is to allow infinite nesting?
That would be my guess, based on the fact that disallowing the opposite
is effectively impossible.
I guess it may be possible by
Which part is the bug? The crash or allowing pools of files that are on a zfs?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 01:48:17PM -0800, Jason Austin wrote:
Which part is the bug? The crash or allowing pools of files that are on a
zfs?
The crash. Disallowing files from a ZFS filesystem would solve part of
the problem, but one could always create a lofi device on top of a ZFS
file, or
On 12/29/06, Eric Schrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 01:48:17PM -0800, Jason Austin wrote:
Which part is the bug? The crash or allowing pools of files that are on a
zfs?
The crash. Disallowing files from a ZFS filesystem would solve part of
the problem, but one could
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 11:23:30PM +0100, Holger Berger wrote:
So the goal is to allow infinite nesting?
That would be my guess, based on the fact that disallowing the opposite
is effectively impossible. However, no serious investigation into this
problem has been done.
- Eric
--
Eric
On 12/29/06, Eric Schrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Dec 29, 2006 at 11:23:30PM +0100, Holger Berger wrote:
So the goal is to allow infinite nesting?
That would be my guess, based on the fact that disallowing the opposite
is effectively impossible.
I guess it may be possible by
