Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: multihosted ZFS

2007-01-26 Thread Darren Dunham
> > On Jan 26, 2007, at 7:17, Peter Eriksson wrote: > >> If you _boot_ the original machine then it should see that the pool > >> now is "owned" by > >> the other host and ignore it (you'd have to do a "zpool import -f" > >> again I think). Not tested though so don't take my word for it... > > > >

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: multihosted ZFS

2007-01-26 Thread Ari-Pekka Oksavuori
Ed Gould wrote: > On Jan 26, 2007, at 7:17, Peter Eriksson wrote: >> If you _boot_ the original machine then it should see that the pool >> now is "owned" by >> the other host and ignore it (you'd have to do a "zpool import -f" >> again I think). Not tested though so don't take my word for it... >

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: multihosted ZFS

2007-01-26 Thread Ari-Pekka Oksavuori
Peter Eriksson wrote: > If you _boot_ the original machine then it should see that the pool now is > "owned" by > the other host and ignore it (you'd have to do a "zpool import -f" again I > think). Not tested though so don't take my word for it... > > However if you simply type "go" and let it

Re: [zfs-discuss] Re: multihosted ZFS

2007-01-26 Thread Ed Gould
On Jan 26, 2007, at 7:17, Peter Eriksson wrote: If you _boot_ the original machine then it should see that the pool now is "owned" by the other host and ignore it (you'd have to do a "zpool import -f" again I think). Not tested though so don't take my word for it... Conceptually, that's about

[zfs-discuss] Re: multihosted ZFS

2007-01-26 Thread Peter Eriksson
If you _boot_ the original machine then it should see that the pool now is "owned" by the other host and ignore it (you'd have to do a "zpool import -f" again I think). Not tested though so don't take my word for it... However if you simply type "go" and let it continue from where it was then t