Hello Matthew,
Thursday, January 4, 2007, 12:11:26 AM, you wrote:
MA> There's also a number of areas where performance could be improved, which
MA> hopefully I'll be able to get to soon.
Any update? I would be definitely interested in speeding up zfs
send/recv process.
MA> When doing remote r
EE> My main question is: does anyone have experience doing this in
EE> production? It looks good on html and man pages, but I would like to
EE> know if there are any caveats I should be aware of. Various threads
EE> I've read in the alias archives do not really seem to talk about
EE> people's ex
Hello Eric,
Saturday, December 23, 2006, 6:26:22 AM, you wrote:
EE> Hi all,
EE> I'm currently investigating solutions for disaster recovery, and would
EE> like to go with a zfs-based solution. From what I understand, there
EE> are two possible methods of achieving this: an iscsi mirror over a W
Hi all,
I'm currently investigating solutions for disaster recovery, and would
like to go with a zfs-based solution. From what I understand, there
are two possible methods of achieving this: an iscsi mirror over a WAN
link, and remote replication with incremental zfs send/recv. Due to
performan
Hi,
By mirroring remotely, you create a dependency between the two
hosts and their interconnects. In general, this will be noticeable
by performance bottlenecks as the system is only as fast as the
slowest component (ala a chain is as strong as its weakest link).
Well what about copying snaps
On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 17:01 -0700, Jeff Bonwick wrote:
> > plan A. To mirror on iSCSI devices:
> > keep one server with a set of zfs file systems
> > with 2 (sub)mirrors each, one of the mirrors use
> > devices physically on remote site accessed as
> > iSCSI LUNs.
> plan A. To mirror on iSCSI devices:
> keep one server with a set of zfs file systems
> with 2 (sub)mirrors each, one of the mirrors use
> devices physically on remote site accessed as
> iSCSI LUNs.
>
> How does ZFS handle remote replication?
> If
Hi,
We are to archive huge amount, say, 100TB, of
data/images and keep a replicate at a remote site. I
thought ZFS will be a good choice. Can someone comment
and advice if it's practical:
plan A. To mirror on iSCSI devices:
keep one server with a set of zfs file systems
with 2
