>
> http://www.itovernight.com/store/comersus_viewItem.asp
> ?idProduct=866720
>
Fly by night from the looks of it.
http://www.resellerratings.com/store/IToverNight
$140 looks like bottom dollar from anywhere reputable (which is more in line
with what I would expect).
http://castle.pricew
On Thu, Dec 06, 2007 at 03:27:33PM -0800, Scott Laird wrote:
> > > MAX3xxxRC (where xxx represents the size) and you'll be wearing a big
> > > smile every time you work on a system so equipped.
> >
> > Hmmm, on second glace, 36G versions of that seem to be going for $40.
>
> Do you mean $140, or a
> On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Brian Hechinger wrote:
> [1] Finally, someone built a flash SSD that rocks
> (and they know how
> fast it is judging by the pricetag):
> http://www.tomshardware.com/2007/11/21/mtron_ssd_32_gb
> /
> http://www.anandtech.com/storage/showdoc.aspx?i=3167
Great now if only Sun w
> 10K RPM SCSI disks will get (best case) 350 to 400 IOPS. Remember,
> the main issue with legacy SCSI is that (SCSI) commands are sent
> 8-bits wide at 5Mbits/Sec - for backwards compatibility.
This is true for really old SCSI configurations, but if you're buying a modern
disk and controller
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 06:12:18PM -0600, Al Hopper wrote:
>
> I don't think you'll see any worthwhile improvement. For a ZIL
> device, you really need something like a (small) SAS 15k RPM 3.5"
> drive - which will sustain 700 to 900 IOPS (my number - open to
> argument) - or a RAM disk or one
On 12/6/07, Brian Hechinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 06:12:18PM -0600, Al Hopper wrote:
> >
> > PS: LsiLogic just updated their SAS HBAs and have a couple of products
> > very reasonably priced IMHO. Combine that with a (single ?) Fujitsu
> > MAX3xxxRC (where xxx repres
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 06:12:18PM -0600, Al Hopper wrote:
>
> PS: LsiLogic just updated their SAS HBAs and have a couple of products
> very reasonably priced IMHO. Combine that with a (single ?) Fujitsu
> MAX3xxxRC (where xxx represents the size) and you'll be wearing a big
> smile every time
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007, Brian Hechinger wrote:
> I will be putting 4 500GB SATA disks in my Ultra80. I currently have
> two 10K rpm 73G SCSI disks in it with 10G for the OS (UFS) and the
> remaining space for a ZFS pool (the two remaining partitions are setup
> in a mirror).
>
> Would it be worth my
Hello Brian,
Wednesday, December 5, 2007, 9:15:10 PM, you wrote:
BH> I will be putting 4 500GB SATA disks in my Ultra80. I currently have
BH> two 10K rpm 73G SCSI disks in it with 10G for the OS (UFS) and the
BH> remaining space for a ZFS pool (the two remaining partitions are setup
BH> in a mir
I will be putting 4 500GB SATA disks in my Ultra80. I currently have
two 10K rpm 73G SCSI disks in it with 10G for the OS (UFS) and the
remaining space for a ZFS pool (the two remaining partitions are setup
in a mirror).
Would it be worth my while to move all the data off of the zfs partitions
of
10 matches
Mail list logo
