On Thu, February 16, 2012 11:18, Paul Kraus wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>
>> I'm seriously thinking of going Nexenta, as I think it would let me be a
>> little less of a sysadmin. Solaris 11 express is tempting in its own
>> way
>> though, if I decide the
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 12:38:07PM -0800, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> Thanks. Given the pricing for commercial Solaris versions, I don't think
> moving to them is likely to ever be important to me. It looks like OI and
> Nexenta are the viable choices I have to look at.
Another option soon to be
On 02/17/12 03:54 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
If you consider paying for solaris - at Oracle, you just pay them for "An
OS" and they don't care which one you use. Could be oracle linux, solaris,
or solaris express. I would recommend solaris 11 express based on personal
experience. It gets bu
On Wed, February 15, 2012 18:06, Brandon High wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:16 AM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
>> Is there an upgrade path from (I think I'm running Solaris Express) to
>> something modern? (That could be an Oracle distribution, or the free
>
> There *was* an upgrade path from
On Thu, February 16, 2012 13:31, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
>> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of David Dyer-Bennet
>>
>> This is already getting useful; "which has never worked for me" for
>> example is the sort of observation I f
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of David Dyer-Bennet
>
> This is already getting useful; "which has never worked for me" for
> example is the sort of observation I find informative, since I've been
> seeing your name around here
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:42 AM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> I'm seriously thinking of going Nexenta, as I think it would let me be a
> little less of a sysadmin. Solaris 11 express is tempting in its own way
> though, if I decide the price is tolerable.
I looked at the Nexenta route, and w
On Thu, February 16, 2012 08:54, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
>> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of David Dyer-Bennet
>>
>> While I'm not in need of upgrading my server at an emergency level, I'm
>> starting to think about it -- to b
> I would recommend solaris 11 express based on personal experience. It
> gets bugfixes and new features sooner than commercial solaris.
I thought they stopped making 11 Express available when 11 went out?
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@openso
On Thu, 16 Feb 2012, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of andy thomas
One of my most vital servers is a Netra 150 dating from 1997 - still going
strong, crammed with 12 x 300 Gb disks and running Solaris 9.
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of David Dyer-Bennet
>
> While I'm not in need of upgrading my server at an emergency level, I'm
> starting to think about it -- to be prepared (and an upgrade could be
> triggered by a failure at
> From: zfs-discuss-boun...@opensolaris.org [mailto:zfs-discuss-
> boun...@opensolaris.org] On Behalf Of andy thomas
>
> One of my most vital servers is a Netra 150 dating from 1997 - still going
> strong, crammed with 12 x 300 Gb disks and running Solaris 9. I think one
> ought to have more faith
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:16 AM, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
> Is there an upgrade path from (I think I'm running Solaris Express) to
> something modern? (That could be an Oracle distribution, or the free
There *was* an upgrade path from snv_134 to snv_151a (Solaris 11
Express) but I don't know if
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
While I'm not in need of upgrading my server at an emergency level, I'm
starting to think about it -- to be prepared (and an upgrade could be
triggered by a failure at this point; my server dates to 2006).
One of my most vital servers is a Netra 15
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
version fits my needs for example.) Upgrading might perhaps save me from
changing all the user passwords (half a dozen, not a huge problem) and
software packages I've added.
(uname -a says "SunOS fsfs 5.11 snv_134 i86pc i386 i86pc").
Or should I ju
On 15/02/2012 17:16, David Dyer-Bennet wrote:
While I'm not in need of upgrading my server at an emergency level, I'm
starting to think about it -- to be prepared (and an upgrade could be
triggered by a failure at this point; my server dates to 2006).
I'm actually more concerned with software th
While I'm not in need of upgrading my server at an emergency level, I'm
starting to think about it -- to be prepared (and an upgrade could be
triggered by a failure at this point; my server dates to 2006).
I'm actually more concerned with software than hardware. My load is
small, the current hard
17 matches
Mail list logo