Just to apologize
This not only sounds lame but IS pretty lame.
Somehow in reading the output of `zpool status POOL', I just blew right
by the URL included there:
http://www.sun.com/msg/ZFS-8000-9P
Which has quite a decent discussion of what it means.
_
Both are driver modules for storage adapters
Properties can be reviewed in the documentation:
ahci: http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5177/ahci-7d?a=view
mpt: http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/816-5177/mpt-7d?a=view
ahci has a man entry on b133, as well.
cheers,
Tonmaus
--
This message posted
Harry Putnam writes:
> Ethan writes:
>
>>> Assuming your drives support SMART, I'd install smartmontools and see if
>> there are any SMART errors on the drive. While the absence of SMART errors
>
> [...]
>
>> I've had trouble getting smartmontools to work with some of my
>> controllers/drives in
Yes. Basically working here. All fine under ahci, some problems under mpt
(smartctl says that WD1002fbys wouldn't allow to store smart events, which I
think is probably nonsense.)
Regards,
Tonmaus
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-d
Ethan writes:
>> Assuming your drives support SMART, I'd install smartmontools and see if
> there are any SMART errors on the drive. While the absence of SMART errors
[...]
> I've had trouble getting smartmontools to work with some of my
> controllers/drives in opensolaris, and have had better
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 18:50, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>>
>> So its not a serious matter? Or maybe more of a potentially serious
>> matter?
>>
>
> It is difficult to say if this is a serious matter or not. It should not
> have happened. The severity
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, Harry Putnam wrote:
So its not a serious matter? Or maybe more of a potentially serious
matter?
It is difficult to say if this is a serious matter or not. It should
not have happened. The severity depends on the cause of the problem
(which may be difficult to figure o
On 03/28/10 10:02 AM, Harry Putnam wrote:
Bob Friesenhahn writes:
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, Harry Putnam wrote:
What to do with a status report like the one included below?
What does it mean to have an unrecoverable error but no data errors?
I think that this summary means tha
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 6:02 PM, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn writes:
>
> > On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, Harry Putnam wrote:
> >
> >> What to do with a status report like the one included below?
> >>
> >> What does it mean to have an unrecoverable error but no data errors?
> >
> > I think that
Bob Friesenhahn writes:
> On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, Harry Putnam wrote:
>
>> What to do with a status report like the one included below?
>>
>> What does it mean to have an unrecoverable error but no data errors?
>
> I think that this summary means that the zfs scrub did not encounter
> any reported r
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010, Harry Putnam wrote:
What to do with a status report like the one included below?
What does it mean to have an unrecoverable error but no data errors?
I think that this summary means that the zfs scrub did not encounter
any reported read/write errors from the disks, but o
What to do with a status report like the one included below?
What does it mean to have an unrecoverable error but no data errors?
Is it just a matter of `clearing' this device? But what would have
prompted such a report then?
Also note the numeral 7 in the CKSUM column for device c3d1s0. What
12 matches
Mail list logo
