Re: [zfs-discuss] What is the 1000 bit?

2010-10-19 Thread Linder, Doug
Nicolas Williams [mailto:nicolas.willi...@oracle.com] wrote: It's the sticky bit. Nowadays it's only useful on directories, and really it's generally only used with 777 permissions. The chmod(1) Thanks. It doesn't seem harmful. But it does make me wonder why it's showing up on my

Re: [zfs-discuss] What is the 1000 bit?

2010-10-19 Thread Tomas Ă–gren
On 19 October, 2010 - Linder, Doug sent me these 1,2K bytes: Nicolas Williams [mailto:nicolas.willi...@oracle.com] wrote: It's the sticky bit. Nowadays it's only useful on directories, and really it's generally only used with 777 permissions. The chmod(1) Thanks. It doesn't seem

[zfs-discuss] What is the 1000 bit?

2010-09-14 Thread Linder, Doug
I recently created a test zpool (RAIDZ) on some iSCSI shares. I made a few test directories and files. When I do a listing, I see something I've never seen before: [r...@hostname anewdir] # ls -la total 6160 drwxr-xr-x 2 root other 4 Sep 14 14:16 . drwxr-xr-x 4 root root

Re: [zfs-discuss] What is the 1000 bit?

2010-09-14 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 04:13:31PM -0400, Linder, Doug wrote: I recently created a test zpool (RAIDZ) on some iSCSI shares. I made a few test directories and files. When I do a listing, I see something I've never seen before: [r...@hostname anewdir] # ls -la total 6160 drwxr-xr-x 2