On 04/02/2010 13:45, Karl Pielorz wrote:
--On 04 February 2010 11:31 + Karl Pielorz
wrote:
What would happen when I tried to 'online' ad2 again?
A reply to my own post... I tried this out, when you make 'ad2' online
again, ZFS immediately logs a 'vdev corrupt' failure, and marks 'ad2
--On 04 February 2010 08:58 -0500 Jacob Ritorto
wrote:
Seems your controller is actually doing only harm here, or am I missing
something?
The RAID controller presents the drives as both a mirrored pair, and JBOD -
*at the same time*...
The machine boots off the partition on the 'mirrore
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010, Karl Pielorz wrote:
The reason for testing this is because of a weird RAID setup I have
where if 'ad2' fails, and gets replaced - the RAID controller is going
to mirror 'ad1' over to 'ad2' - and cannot be stopped.
Does the raid controller not support a JBOD mode?
Regards
Seems your controller is actually doing only harm here, or am I missing
something?
On Feb 4, 2010 8:46 AM, "Karl Pielorz" wrote:
--On 04 February 2010 11:31 + Karl Pielorz
wrote:
> What would happen...
A reply to my own post... I tried this out, when you make 'ad2' online
again, ZFS immed
--On 04 February 2010 11:31 + Karl Pielorz
wrote:
What would happen when I tried to 'online' ad2 again?
A reply to my own post... I tried this out, when you make 'ad2' online
again, ZFS immediately logs a 'vdev corrupt' failure, and marks 'ad2'
(which at this point is a byte-for-byte
Hi All,
I've been using ZFS for a while now - and everything's been going well. I
use it under FreeBSD - but this question almost certainly should be the
same answer, whether it's FreeBSD or Solaris (I think/hope :)...
Imagine if I have a zpool with 2 disks in it, that are mirrored:
"
NAME
