I'm not entirely convinced there is no problem here I had a WD EADS
1.5TB die, the warranty replacement drive was a EARS. So, first foray into
4k sectors.
I had 8x EADS in a raidz set, had replaced the broken one with a 1.5TB
Seagate 7200rpm - which was obviously faster.
Just replacing back,
On 27.03.2010 11:01, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 08:47:26PM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 05:57:31PM -0700, Darren Mackay wrote:
>>> not sure if 32bit BSD supports 48bit LBA
>>
>> Solaris is the only otherwise-modern OS with this daft limitation.
>
>
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 08:47:26PM +1100, Daniel Carosone wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 05:57:31PM -0700, Darren Mackay wrote:
> > not sure if 32bit BSD supports 48bit LBA
>
> Solaris is the only otherwise-modern OS with this daft limitation.
Ok, it's not due to LBA48, but the 1Tb limitation i
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 05:57:31PM -0700, Darren Mackay wrote:
> not sure if 32bit BSD supports 48bit LBA
Solaris is the only otherwise-modern OS with this daft limitation.
--
Dan.
pgpE9xlpyJDRZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
zfs-discuss mailing
> It would be nice if the 32bit osol kernel support
> 48bit LBA
Is already supported, for may years (otherwise
disks with a capacity >= 128GB could not be
used with Solaris) ...
> (similar to linux, not sure if 32bit BSD
> supports 48bit LBA ), then the drive would probably
> work - perhaps late
For the time being, the EARS series of drives actually present 512 byte sectors
to the o/s through emulation in firmware.
The drive I tested was WD20EARS (2TB WD Caviar Green Advanced Format drives):
MDL: WD20EARS-00S81
DATE: 29 DEC 2009
DCM: HBRNHT2BB
DCX: 6019S1W87
LBA: 3907029168
The LBA abo
On Mar 26, 2010, at 8:58 AM, Svein Skogen wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 26.03.2010 16:55, Bottone, Frank wrote:
>> Does zfs handle 4kb sectors properly or does it always assume 512b sectors?
>>
>>
>>
>> If it does, we could manually create a slice properly ali
Awesome!
Just when I thought zfs couldn’t get any better...
-Original Message-
From: larry@sun.com [mailto:larry@sun.com]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 11:58 AM
To: Bottone, Frank
Cc: zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
Subject: Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and 4kb sector Drives (All new
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26.03.2010 16:55, Bottone, Frank wrote:
> Does zfs handle 4kb sectors properly or does it always assume 512b sectors?
>
>
>
> If it does, we could manually create a slice properly aligned and set
> zfs to use it?
A real simple patch would be to
Yes, it does.
Bottone, Frank 写道:
Does zfs handle 4kb sectors properly or does it always assume 512b
sectors?
If it does, we could manually create a slice properly aligned and set
zfs to use it…
--
The sender of this email subscribes to Perimeter E-Security's email
anti-virus service. T
Does zfs handle 4kb sectors properly or does it always assume 512b sectors?
If it does, we could manually create a slice properly aligned and set zfs to
use it...
--
The sender of this email subscribes to Perimeter E-Security's email
anti-virus service. This email has been scanned for mal
11 matches
Mail list logo
