Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and HDLM 5.8 ... does that coexist well ? [MD21]

2007-01-23 Thread Rob Logan
FWIW, the Micropolis 1355 is a 141 MByte (!) ESDI disk. The MD21 is an ESDI to SCSI converter. yup... its the board in the middle left of http://rob.com/sun/sun2/md21.jpg Rob ___ zfs-discuss mailing list

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and HDLM 5.8 ... does that coexist well ? [MD21]

2007-01-23 Thread Joerg Schilling
Rob Logan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: FWIW, the Micropolis 1355 is a 141 MByte (!) ESDI disk. The MD21 is an ESDI to SCSI converter. yup... its the board in the middle left of http://rob.com/sun/sun2/md21.jpg If you are talking about the middle right, this is a ACB-4000 series controller

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and HDLM 5.8 ... does that coexist well ?

2007-01-17 Thread Torrey McMahon
There looks to be code in the DLM package that either Connects to the HDS box and queries for some info or Reads some attributes in the SCSI mode pages to get the info. (I'm guessing this one.) In any case HDS would have to share said knowledge with Sun so the correct

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and HDLM 5.8 ... does that coexist well ?

2007-01-16 Thread Cindy Swearingen
Hi Torrey, The MD21 entries were removed from the /etc/format.dat file in the Solaris 10 release although the controller itself was EOL'd long before this release. However, the entries are not removed upon upgrade from a previous release, which is this bug:

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and HDLM 5.8 ... does that coexist well ?

2007-01-16 Thread Gael
All, And on that one big mea culpa, the wanboot.conf install file used the solaris 9 miniroot to load that solaris 10 U3 machine... explaining why the MD21 lines appeared on that machine ... (last time I do play lazy admin and don't refresh the whole wanboot config files before loading Solaris

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and HDLM 5.8 ... does that coexist well ?

2007-01-16 Thread Gael
This command is often used to identify the physical disk linked to the LUN (iLu) to allow the San team to deallocate/identify the right physical disk(s) etc... vsmd8008:/root #/opt/DynamicLinkManager/bin/dlnkmgr view -drv PathID HDevName Device LDEV 00 c4t50060E8004572420d71

[zfs-discuss] ZFS and HDLM 5.8 ... does that coexist well ?

2007-01-13 Thread Gael
Hello, I'm currently trying to convert a system from Solaris 10 U1 with Veritas VM to Solaris 10 U3 with ZFS... the san portion of the server is managed by Hitachi HDLM 5.8. I'm seeing two distinct errors... let me know if they are classical or if I should open a ticket (bug report)... Thanks

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and HDLM 5.8 ... does that coexist well ?

2007-01-13 Thread Richard Elling
Gael wrote: Hello, I'm currently trying to convert a system from Solaris 10 U1 with Veritas VM to Solaris 10 U3 with ZFS... the san portion of the server is managed by Hitachi HDLM 5.8. I'm seeing two distinct errors... let me know if they are classical or if I should open a ticket (bug

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and HDLM 5.8 ... does that coexist well ?

2007-01-13 Thread Eric Schrock
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 12:11:26PM -0800, Richard Elling wrote: So, what is in your format.dat? I haven't seen an MD21 in over 15 years. I would have thought that we removed it from format.dat long ago... -- richard This sounds like: 5020503 *format* Unknown controller 'MD21' warnings

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and HDLM 5.8 ... does that coexist well ?

2007-01-13 Thread Gael
On 1/13/07, Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gael wrote: Hello, I'm currently trying to convert a system from Solaris 10 U1 with Veritas VM to Solaris 10 U3 with ZFS... the san portion of the server is managed by Hitachi HDLM 5.8. I'm seeing two distinct errors... let me know if

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and HDLM 5.8 ... does that coexist well ?

2007-01-13 Thread Gael
On 1/13/07, Eric Schrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 12:11:26PM -0800, Richard Elling wrote: So, what is in your format.dat? I haven't seen an MD21 in over 15 years. I would have thought that we removed it from format.dat long ago... -- richard This sounds like:

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and HDLM 5.8 ... does that coexist well ?

2007-01-13 Thread Eric Schrock
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 01:30:19PM -0600, Gael wrote: Hello, jumps8002 #zpool create sanpool c7t50060E8004758654d0 c7t50060E8004758654d1 c7t50060E8004758654d2 cannot open '/dev/dsk/c7t50060E8004758654d0s0': This is a strange error, can you do a 'truss -topen' of this process? Does the

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and HDLM 5.8 ... does that coexist well ?

2007-01-13 Thread Gael
On 1/13/07, Eric Schrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 01:30:19PM -0600, Gael wrote: Hello, jumps8002 #zpool create sanpool c7t50060E8004758654d0 c7t50060E8004758654d1 c7t50060E8004758654d2 cannot open '/dev/dsk/c7t50060E8004758654d0s0': This is a strange error, can you

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and HDLM 5.8 ... does that coexist well ?

2007-01-13 Thread Joerg Schilling
Eric Schrock [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 12:11:26PM -0800, Richard Elling wrote: So, what is in your format.dat? I haven't seen an MD21 in over 15 years. I would have thought that we removed it from format.dat long ago... -- richard This sounds like: 5020503

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and HDLM 5.8 ... does that coexist well ?

2007-01-13 Thread Richard Elling
Gael wrote: jumps8002:/etc/apache2 #cat /etc/release Solaris 10 11/06 s10s_u3wos_10 SPARC Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms. Assembled 14 November 2006

Re: [zfs-discuss] ZFS and HDLM 5.8 ... does that coexist well ?

2007-01-13 Thread Torrey McMahon
Richard Elling wrote: Gael wrote: jumps8002:/etc/apache2 #cat /etc/release Solaris 10 11/06 s10s_u3wos_10 SPARC Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Use is subject to license terms.