>> But it is a problem when you more memory then you can map (1GB will
>> probably still work but 2GB is "too big".
>
>This here is my problem. I've got 4GB of RAM in the box. It's painful. ;)
Have you changed kernelbase? Lowering it will help performance.
Casper
__
On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 10:39:45AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Ok, thanx for your input, guys. So Bvians comment still is valid. I
> >tell the Linux guys that "Open Solaris on 32 bit will fragment the
> >memory to the point that you have to reboot once in a while. It
> >shouldnt corrupt y
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 4:39 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not sure that that is completely true; I've run a small 32-bit file server
> and it ran for half a year or more (except when I wanted to upgrade)
>
> But that system had only 512 MB memory and I made the kernel's VA bigger
> than th
>Ok, thanx for your input, guys. So Bvians comment still is valid. I
>tell the Linux guys that "Open Solaris on 32 bit will fragment the
>memory to the point that you have to reboot once in a while. It
>shouldnt corrupt your data when it runs out of RAM."
I'm not sure that that is completely tru
Ok, thanx for your input, guys. So Bvians comment still is valid. I tell the
Linux guys that "OpenSolaris on 32 bit will fragment the memory to the point
that you have to reboot once in a while. It shouldnt corrupt your data when it
runs out of RAM."
Vodevick.
--
This message posted from opens
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 01:36:35PM -0800, Joseph Mocker wrote:
> Does PAE help things at all on 32-bit ?
No.
-brian
--
"Coding in C is like sending a 3 year old to do groceries. You gotta
tell them exactly what you want or you'll end up with a cupboard full of
pop tarts and pancake mix." -- IRC
Does PAE help things at all on 32-bit ?
Brian Hechinger wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 12:42:44PM -0600, Tim wrote:
>
>> "Solaris + ZFS and this is a concern"
>>
>> Sounds to me like they want to try out solaris + zfs, not "zfs on fuse".
>>
>
> Ooops, misread what he said. Sorry about
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 12:42:44PM -0600, Tim wrote:
> "Solaris + ZFS and this is a concern"
>
> Sounds to me like they want to try out solaris + zfs, not "zfs on fuse".
Ooops, misread what he said. Sorry about that.
I suppose my original comment still stands then. :)
-brian
--
"Coding in C i
On Sat, Dec 6, 2008 at 10:59 AM, Brian Hechinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 11:31:06AM -0500, Toby Thain wrote:
> >
> > > Its not me. There are people on Linux forums that wont to try out
> > > Solaris + ZFS and this is a concern, for them. What should I tell
> > > them?
On Sat, Dec 06, 2008 at 11:31:06AM -0500, Toby Thain wrote:
>
> > Its not me. There are people on Linux forums that wont to try out
> > Solaris + ZFS and this is a concern, for them. What should I tell
> > them? That it is not fixed? That they have reboot every week?
> > Someone knows?
>
>
On 6-Dec-08, at 7:10 AM, Orvar Korvar wrote:
> Its not me. There are people on Linux forums that wont to try out
> Solaris + ZFS and this is a concern, for them. What should I tell
> them? That it is not fixed? That they have reboot every week?
> Someone knows?
That it's not recommended f
Its not me. There are people on Linux forums that wont to try out Solaris + ZFS
and this is a concern, for them. What should I tell them? That it is not fixed?
That they have reboot every week? Someone knows?
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
On Fri, Dec 05, 2008 at 11:35:27AM -0800, Orvar Korvar wrote:
> I see this old post about ZFS fragmenting the RAM if it is 32 bit. This makes
> the memory run out. Is it still true, or has it been fixed?
Don't waste your time trying to run ZFS on a 32-bit machine. The performance
is horrible. I
I see this old post about ZFS fragmenting the RAM if it is 32 bit. This makes
the memory run out. Is it still true, or has it been fixed?
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2006-July/003506.html
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
__
14 matches
Mail list logo
