Hello eric,
Thursday, February 22, 2007, 5:44:35 PM, you wrote:
ek> On Feb 9, 2007, at 8:02 AM, Carisdad wrote:
>> I've seen very good performance on streaming large files to ZFS on
>> a T2000. We have been looking at using the T2000 as a disk storage
>> unit for backups. I've been able to
On Feb 22, 2007, at 10:01 AM, Carisdad wrote:
eric kustarz wrote:
On Feb 9, 2007, at 8:02 AM, Carisdad wrote:
I've seen very good performance on streaming large files to ZFS
on a T2000. We have been looking at using the T2000 as a disk
storage unit for backups. I've been able to push o
eric kustarz wrote:
On Feb 9, 2007, at 8:02 AM, Carisdad wrote:
I've seen very good performance on streaming large files to ZFS on a
T2000. We have been looking at using the T2000 as a disk storage
unit for backups. I've been able to push over 500MB/s to the disks.
Setup is EMC Clariion CX
On Feb 9, 2007, at 8:02 AM, Carisdad wrote:
I've seen very good performance on streaming large files to ZFS on
a T2000. We have been looking at using the T2000 as a disk storage
unit for backups. I've been able to push over 500MB/s to the
disks. Setup is EMC Clariion CX3 with 84 500GB SA
I've seen very good performance on streaming large files to ZFS on a
T2000. We have been looking at using the T2000 as a disk storage unit
for backups. I've been able to push over 500MB/s to the disks. Setup is
EMC Clariion CX3 with 84 500GB SATA drives connected w/ 4Gbps all the
way to the d
> Would the logic behind ZFS take full advantage of a heavily multicored
> system, such as on the Sun Niagara platform? Would it utilize of the
> 32 concurrent threads for generating its checksums? Has anyone
> compared ZFS on a Sun Tx000, to that of a 2-4 thread x64 machine?
Pete and I are workin
>With the CPU overhead imposed in checksum of blocks by ZFS, on a large
>sequential write test, the CPU was heavily loaded in a test that I ran.
>By turning off the checksum, the CPU load was greatly reduced.
>Obviously, this caused a tradeoff in reliability for CPU cycles.
What hardware platform
With the CPU overhead imposed in checksum of blocks by ZFS, on a large
sequential write test, the CPU was heavily loaded in a test that I ran. By
turning off the checksum, the CPU load was greatly reduced. Obviously, this
caused a tradeoff in reliability for CPU cycles.
Would the logic behind Z
