[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> I also tried using O_DSYNC, which stops the pathological behaviour but makes
> things pretty slow - I only get a maximum of about 20MBytes/sec, which is
> obviously much less than the hardware can sustain.
I may misunderstand this situation, but while you're waiting for
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008, Roch Bourbonnais wrote:
>> The latter appears to be bug 6429855. But the underlying behaviour
>> doesn't really seem desirable; are there plans afoot to do any work on
>> ZFS write throttling to address this kind of thing?
>
> Throttling is being addressed.
>
> http://bug
On 2/15/08, Roch Bourbonnais <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Le 15 févr. 08 à 11:38, Philip Beevers a écrit :
>
[...]
> > Obviously this isn't good behaviour, but it's particularly unfortunate
> > given that this checkpoint is stuff that I don't want to retain in any
> > kind of cache anyway - i
Hi Roch,
Thanks for the response.
> Throttling is being addressed.
>
>
> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6429205
>
>
> BTW, the new code will adjust write speed to disk speed very quickly.
> You will not see those ultra fast initial checkpoints. Is
> this a c
Le 15 févr. 08 à 11:38, Philip Beevers a écrit :
> Hi everyone,
>
> This is my first post to zfs-discuss, so be gentle with me :-)
>
> I've been doing some testing with ZFS - in particular, in
> checkpointing
> the large, proprietary in-memory database which is a key part of the
> application I
Hi everyone,
This is my first post to zfs-discuss, so be gentle with me :-)
I've been doing some testing with ZFS - in particular, in checkpointing
the large, proprietary in-memory database which is a key part of the
application I work on. In doing this I've found what seems to be some
fairly unh
