On 09/19/12 02:38 AM, Sašo Kiselkov wrote:
On 09/18/2012 04:31 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Can I actually have a year's worth of snapshots in
zfs without too much performance degradation?
Each additional dataset (not sure about snapshots, though) increases
boot times slightly, however, I've seen
I'm currently thinking about rolling a variant of
http://www.napp-it.org/napp-it/all-in-one/index_en.html
with remote backup (via snapshot and send) to 2-3
other (HP N40L-based) zfs boxes for production in
our organisation. The systems themselves would
be either Dell or Supermicro (latter with
On 09/18/2012 04:31 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
I'm currently thinking about rolling a variant of
http://www.napp-it.org/napp-it/all-in-one/index_en.html
with remote backup (via snapshot and send) to 2-3
other (HP N40L-based) zfs boxes for production in
our organisation. The systems
On 9/18/2012 10:31 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
I'm currently thinking about rolling a variant of
http://www.napp-it.org/napp-it/all-in-one/index_en.html
with remote backup (via snapshot and send) to 2-3
other (HP N40L-based) zfs boxes for production in
our organisation. The systems themselves would
On Sep 18, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
On 9/18/2012 10:31 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
I'm currently thinking about rolling a variant of
http://www.napp-it.org/napp-it/all-in-one/index_en.html
with remote backup (via snapshot and send) to 2-3
other (HP N40L-based) zfs boxes
On Sep 18, 2012, at 10:40 AM, Dan Swartzendruber wrote:
On 9/18/2012 10:31 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
I'm currently thinking about rolling a variant of
http://www.napp-it.org/napp-it/all-in-one/index_en.html
with remote backup (via snapshot and send) to 2-3
other (HP N40L-based) zfs boxes for
On 18 sept. 2012, at 16:40, Dan Swartzendruber dswa...@druber.com wrote:
On 9/18/2012 10:31 AM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
I'm currently thinking about rolling a variant of
http://www.napp-it.org/napp-it/all-in-one/index_en.html
with remote backup (via snapshot and send) to 2-3
other (HP
On Sep 18, 2012, at 7:31 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org wrote:
Can I actually have a year's worth of snapshots in
zfs without too much performance degradation?
I've got 6 years of snapshots with no degradation :-)
In general, there is not a direct correlation between snapshot count and
I've installed a good number of all-in-one ZFS solutions, mostly based
around NexentaStor and VMWare ESXi on HP ProLiant hardware.
An example of this is documented on Server Fault at:
http://serverfault.com/a/398579/13325
--
Edmund White
ewwh...@mac.com
On 9/18/12 10:31 AM, Eugen Leitl
Richard Elling wrote:
On Sep 18, 2012, at 7:31 AM, Eugen Leitl eu...@leitl.org
mailto:eu...@leitl.org wrote:
Can I actually have a year's worth of snapshots in
zfs without too much performance degradation?
I've got 6 years of snapshots with no degradation :-)
$ zfs list -t snapshot -r
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Erik Ableson wrote:
The bigger issue you'll run into will be data sizing as a year's
worth of snapshot basically means that you're keeping a journal of
every single write that's occurred over the year. If you are running
The above is not a correct statement. The
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:02 PM, Bob Friesenhahn
bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us wrote:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Erik Ableson wrote:
The bigger issue you'll run into will be data sizing as a year's worth of
snapshot basically means that you're keeping a journal of every single
write that's
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 05:30:56PM +0200, Erik Ableson wrote:
If you're running ESXi with a vSphere license, I'd recommend looking at VDR
(free with the vCenter license) for backing up the VMs to the little HPs
since you get compressed and deduplicated backups that will minimize the
13 matches
Mail list logo
