No probs, glad it worked for you too. It gave me quite a fright too when it
happened :)
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
Sorry, I don't know what happened, but it seems like I was not subscribed to
receive replies for this thread so I never saw people's replies to my original
post... user error probably :)
jone, I think you hit the nail on the head: I *do* seem to remember issuing a
'zfs mount -a' at some point,
On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 07:04:35PM +0200, Arthur Bundo wrote:
> I am sorry but it says it is empty 2, it doesn't say it is busy.
>
Hm, maybe autofs is in the play somewhere, having put his hands on /home?
Sorry, coming late to this thread, so this may be irrelevant or ruled out
before...
But IIRC,
I am sorry but it says it is empty 2, it doesn't say it is busy.
This is so unreal, I have no idea how to reproduce this bug, i know i just
upgraded to 111b and i am sorry i am so ignorant and don't know how to help you
guys to solve this bug.
Best regards on your wonderful work and efforts.
A
Arthur Bundo wrote:
what does the present /export/home folder contain ?
contains nothing, it is empty
I'm not convinced. If the directory is empty then the link count will
be 2 (. and ..). For example,
$ mkdir
/tmp/empty
> what does the present /export/home folder contain ?
contains nothing, it is empty
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
i've seen a problem where periodically a 'zfs mount -a' and sometimes
a 'zpool import ' can create what appears to be a race condition
on nested mounts .. that is .. let's say that i have:
FS mountpoint
pool/export
pool/fs1
On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 1:45 AM, Arthur Bundo wrote:
> I want to thank you for your quick response.
>
> Regarding the learning curve, i really don't have enough time to go in deep
> of the things anymore, i just like the stability of the Solaris platform in
> general, and i used it at home years
I want to thank you for your quick response.
Regarding the learning curve, i really don't have enough time to go in deep of
the things anymore, i just like the stability of the Solaris platform in
general, and i used it at home years from now.
All i need now is some out of the box installation
Something is bothering me about this thread. It seems to me that
if the system provides an error message such as "cannot mount
'/tank/home': directory is not empty" then the first plan of action
should be to look and see what is there, no?
The issue of overlaying mounts has existed for about 3
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 4:35 AM, Arthur Bundo wrote:
> I cant login as root anymore with su , as x user i cant execute almost
> anything as sys to do some maintenance , only in single mode at boot,
After you log on as the use x (let's call this user "arthur"), see if
you can run "pfexec su -" and
I cant login as root anymore with su , as x user i cant execute almost anything
as sys to do some maintenance , only in single mode at boot, name of system is
"unknown" now, just got tired of this thing now, i don't want to learn solaris,
dont have time for that , just wanted to use it since the
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 2:14 AM, Arthur Bundo wrote:
> i reread my post, it makes dizzy even me, right.
>
> the problem i have is this, i had a user x with home directory /export/home/x
> .
> some days before i upgraded from 101 to 111, and on nautilus i tried to make
> snapshots of / and /export
i reread my post, it makes dizzy even me, right.
the problem i have is this, i had a user x with home directory /export/home/x .
some days before i upgraded from 101 to 111, and on nautilus i tried to make
snapshots of / and /export/home/x and when i reboot some time after i couldn't
login norma
> "ab" == Arthur Bundo writes:
ab> the only way i can login is by login as x
ab> at terminal without gnome then i pfexec gdm
login to the console. Do not use X11 at all. nautilus is completely
out of the question I'm afraid.
After you login can you do something like:
exec pfexec
On Tue, 09 Jun 2009 01:37:53 -0700 (PDT)
Arthur Bundo wrote:
> >>> rmdir /export/home/x
>
> but i need the /export/home/x folder, in fact from the whole opensolaris
> folders this is the only one i need really, i just cant get it mounted
> normally at boot and as user x it drops me to a root
>>> rmdir /export/home/x
but i need the /export/home/x folder, in fact from the whole opensolaris
folders this is the only one i need really, i just cant get it mounted normally
at boot and as user x it drops me to a root account folder with no contents and
in failsafe terminal only. i cant lo
> "ab" == Arthur Bundo writes:
ab> I have a "/export/home/x" directory
something like:
umount /export/home/x
rmdir /export/home/x
rmdir /export/home <-- not needed. but it should give no error if
/export/home is really empty, so it's a good
I have a "/export/home/x" directory (my home directory) which can not be
mounted during boot time and i have a lot of stuff there, too critical for me
to experiment there, i can login at failsafe session and i open nautilus as
root and on the snapshots on / i see no export/home/x but on export/
Arthur Bundo wrote:
same history happened to me on build 111 and i still don't know what to do
What do you see in /tank/home?
Can you do an overlay mount, zfs mount -O tank/home?
--
Ian.
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
ht
same history happened to me on build 111 and i still don't know what to do
--
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/zfs-discuss
21 matches
Mail list logo
