Louis-Frédéric Feuillette wrote:
Hello all,
If you have copies=2 on a large enough raid-z(2) pool and 2(3) disks
die, is it possible to recover that information despite the offline
state of the pool?
I don't have this happening to me, it's just a theoretical question.
So, if you can't recover t
Hello all,
If you have copies=2 on a large enough raid-z(2) pool and 2(3) disks
die, is it possible to recover that information despite the offline
state of the pool?
I don't have this happening to me, it's just a theoretical question.
So, if you can't recover the data, is there any advantage to
On 22 January, 2008 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent me these 1,6K bytes:
> bash-3.00# cat /etc/release
> Solaris 10 8/07 s10x_u4wos_12b X86
>Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
> Use is subject to license terms.
>
bash-3.00# cat /etc/release
Solaris 10 8/07 s10x_u4wos_12b X86
Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to license terms.
Assembled 16 August 2007
(with all the latest patches)
On 24-May-07, at 6:26 AM, Henk Langeveld wrote:
Richard Elling wrote:
It all depends on the configuration. For a single disk system,
copies
should generally be faster than mirroring. For multiple disks, the
performance should be similar as copies are spread out over different
disks.
Here
Richard Elling wrote:
It all depends on the configuration. For a single disk system, copies
should generally be faster than mirroring. For multiple disks, the
performance should be similar as copies are spread out over different
disks.
Here's a crazy idea: could we use zfs on dvd for s/w dist
Hello Richard,
Wednesday, March 21, 2007, 6:23:05 PM, you wrote:
RE> Robert Milkowski wrote:
RE> Wouldn't that fall under the generic rewrite/shrink functionality we're also
RE> anxiously waiting for? Note that this also brings up a nasty edge case
where
RE> the rewrite may cause you to run ou
Richard Elling wrote:
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Richard,
Wednesday, March 21, 2007, 1:48:23 AM, you wrote:
RE> Yes, PSARC 2007/121 integrated into build 61 (and there was much
rejoicing :-)
RE> I'm working on some models which will show the affect on various RAID
RE> configurations and i
Robert Milkowski wrote:
Hello Richard,
Wednesday, March 21, 2007, 1:48:23 AM, you wrote:
RE> Yes, PSARC 2007/121 integrated into build 61 (and there was much rejoicing
:-)
RE> I'm working on some models which will show the affect on various RAID
RE> configurations and intend to post some resul
Hello Richard,
Wednesday, March 21, 2007, 1:48:23 AM, you wrote:
RE> Yes, PSARC 2007/121 integrated into build 61 (and there was much rejoicing
:-)
RE> I'm working on some models which will show the affect on various RAID
RE> configurations and intend to post some results soon. Suffice to say,
Yes, PSARC 2007/121 integrated into build 61 (and there was much rejoicing :-)
I'm working on some models which will show the affect on various RAID
configurations and intend to post some results soon. Suffice to say, if
you have a stripe with > 1 disk, you might be able to survive loss of a
disk
Hello zfs-discuss,
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6459491
I guess some people here will be happy :)
ps. now think about all these questions: what do you think about HW
RAID5 LUNs with raidz2 on top of this with ditto block set to 3? Or
maybe 2 would be good
12 matches
Mail list logo
