Hey Johansen,
I can confirm that 6566207 has been fixed by the new driver!
I haven't been able to reproduce 6565894 so cannot confirm whether or not this
is fixed.
Thanks for the fix, open source rocks :)
Murray
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
In an attempt to speed up progress on some of the si3124 bugs that Roger
reported, I've created a workspace with the fixes for:
6565894 sata drives are not identified by si3124 driver
6566207 si3124 driver loses interrupts.
I'm attaching a driver which contains these fixes as well as a diff
On Tue, 17 Jul 2007, Nigel Smith wrote:
> You can see the status of bug here:
>
> http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6566207
>
> Unfortunately, it's showing no progress since 20th June.
>
> This fix really could do to be in place for S10u4 and snv_70.
>
Drop Roger Fujii <[EMAIL PROTE
You can see the status of bug here:
http://bugs.opensolaris.org/view_bug.do?bug_id=6566207
Unfortunately, it's showing no progress since 20th June.
This fix really could do to be in place for S10u4 and snv_70.
Thanks
Nigel Smith
This message posted from opensolaris.org
_
Does anyone have an update on this bugfix?
I'm trying to use some 3124 cards in production, and its painful!
Thanks,
Murray
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
zfs-discuss@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it's been assigned CR 6566207 by Linda Bernal. Basically, if you look
at si_intr and read the comments in the code, the bug is pretty
obvious.
si3124 driver's interrupt routine is incorrectly coded. The ddi_put32
that clears the interrupts should be enclosed in an "
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Marko Milisavljevic wrote:
Al,
Do you know if this affects Sil3132 cards as well? According to this
I'm sure it would affect any hardware that uses the driver - because
it'll drop interrupts from the device. But I have not verified this
to be the case.
http://www.dan
> it's been assigned CR 6566207 by Linda Bernal. Basically, if you look
> at si_intr and read the comments in the code, the bug is pretty
> obvious.
>
> si3124 driver's interrupt routine is incorrectly coded. The ddi_put32
> that clears the interrupts should be enclosed in an "else" block,
>
Al,
Do you know if this affects Sil3132 cards as well? According to this
http://www.dansketcher.com/2006/12/09/solaris-sata-chipsets-i-can-run-zsf-with/Sil3124
driver can be persuaded to work with Sil3132 cards with change in
/etc/driver_aliases.
Marko
On 6/7/07, Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
Good news on the si3124 driver bug I mentioned:
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/zfs-discuss/2007-May/028487.html
http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/storage-discuss/2007-May/001288.html
Roger Fujii, a long time contributor to the Solaris on x86 list
([EMAIL PROTECTED]), root caused the
10 matches
Mail list logo
