-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Louwtjie Burger wrote:
On 11/8/07, Richard Elling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Potentially, depending on the write part of the workload, the system may
read
128 kBytes to get a 16 kByte block. This is not efficient and may be
noticeable
as a
Louwtjie Burger writes:
Hi
What is the impact of not aligning the DB blocksize (16K) with ZFS,
especially when it comes to random reads on single HW RAID LUN.
How would one go about measuring the impact (if any) on the workload?
The DB will have a bigger in memory footprint as
Yes. Blocks are compressed individually, so a smaller block size will (on
average) lead to less compression. (Assuming that your data is compressible at
all, that is.)
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
zfs-discuss mailing list
