I might be mistaken, but it looks like 3ware does have a driver, several in
fact:
http://www.3ware.com/support/downloadpageprod.asp?pcode=9&path=Escalade9500SSeries&prodname=3ware%209500S%20Series
Any comment on this? I'm thinking about picking up a server with this card,
and it would be cool
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Richard Elling wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2010, at 3:25 PM, Marc Nicholas wrote:
>
> > Richard,
> >
> > My challenge to you is that at least three vedors that I know of built
> > their storage platforms on FreeBSD. One of them sells $4bn/year of
> > product - petty sure t
On Mar 26, 2010, at 3:25 PM, Marc Nicholas wrote:
> Richard,
>
> My challenge to you is that at least three vedors that I know of built
> their storage platforms on FreeBSD. One of them sells $4bn/year of
> product - petty sure that eclipses all (Open)Solaris-based storage ;)
FreeBSD 8 or FreeB
On 03/27/10 11:32 AM, Svein Skogen wrote:
On 26.03.2010 23:25, Marc Nicholas wrote:
Richard,
My challenge to you is that at least three vedors that I know of built
their storage platforms on FreeBSD. One of them sells $4bn/year of
product - petty sure that eclipses all (Open)Solaris-based s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26.03.2010 23:25, Marc Nicholas wrote:
> Richard,
>
> My challenge to you is that at least three vedors that I know of built
> their storage platforms on FreeBSD. One of them sells $4bn/year of
> product - petty sure that eclipses all (Open)Solaris
Richard,
My challenge to you is that at least three vedors that I know of built
their storage platforms on FreeBSD. One of them sells $4bn/year of
product - petty sure that eclipses all (Open)Solaris-based storage ;)
-marc
On 3/26/10, Richard Elling wrote:
> On Mar 26, 2010, at 4:46 AM, Edward
On Mar 26, 2010, at 4:46 AM, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> What does everyone thing about that? I bet it is not as mature as on
>> OpenSolaris.
>
> "mature" is not the right term in this case. FreeBSD has been around much
> longer than opensolaris, and it's equally if not more mature.
Bill Joy mig
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
"mature" is not the right term in this case. FreeBSD has been around much
longer than opensolaris, and it's equally if not more mature. FreeBSD is
probably somewhat less featureful. Because their focus is heavily on the
reliability and stability si
> While I use zfs with FreeBSD (FreeNAS appliance with 4x SATA 1 TByte
> drives)
> it is trailing OpenSolaris by at least a year if not longer and hence
> lacks
> many key features people pick zfs over other file systems. The
> performance,
> especially CIFS is quite lacking. Purportedly (I have ne
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 07:46:01AM -0400, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
> And FreeBSD in general will be built using older versions of packages than
> what's in OpenSolaris.
>
> Both are good OSes. If you can use FreeBSD but OpenSolaris doesn't have the
> driver for your hardware, go for it.
While I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26.03.2010 12:46, Edward Ned Harvey wrote:
>> OK, I have 3Ware looking into a driver for my cards (3ware 9500S-8) as
>> I dont see an OpenSolaris driver for them.
>>
>> But this leads me that they do have a FreeBSD Driver, so I could still
>> use ZF
> OK, I have 3Ware looking into a driver for my cards (3ware 9500S-8) as
> I dont see an OpenSolaris driver for them.
>
> But this leads me that they do have a FreeBSD Driver, so I could still
> use ZFS.
>
> What does everyone thing about that? I bet it is not as mature as on
> OpenSolaris.
"mat
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Slack-Moehrle <
mailingli...@mailnewsrss.com> wrote:
> OK, I have 3Ware looking into a driver for my cards (3ware 9500S-8) as I
> dont see an OpenSolaris driver for them.
>
> But this leads me that they do have a FreeBSD Driver, so I could still use
> ZFS.
>
> Wha
13 matches
Mail list logo
