Re: Re[4]: [zfs-discuss] Re: 3510 HW RAID vs 3510 JBOD ZFS SOFTWARE RAID

2006-08-08 Thread Luke Lonergan
Robert, > LL> Most of my ZFS experiments have been with RAID10, but there were some > LL> massive improvements to seq I/O with the fixes I mentioned - I'd expect > that > LL> this shows that they aren't in snv44. > > So where did you get those fixes? >From the fine people who implemented them!

Re[4]: [zfs-discuss] Re: 3510 HW RAID vs 3510 JBOD ZFS SOFTWARE RAID

2006-08-08 Thread Robert Milkowski
Hello Luke, Tuesday, August 8, 2006, 6:18:39 PM, you wrote: LL> Robert, LL> On 8/8/06 9:11 AM, "Robert Milkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> 1. UFS, noatime, HW RAID5 6 disks, S10U2 >> 70MB/s >> 2. ZFS, atime=off, HW RAID5 6 disks, S10U2 (the same lun as in #1) >> 87MB/s >> 3. ZFS,