My only point: Is there any room for camouflage in war? It would seem
more natural.
Stacy.
At 05:03 PM 11/22/2002 -0600, you wrote:
The Taliban/Al Qaeda mark themselves in a different manner, because their
customs are different. They show their beliefs through covering their
women and keeping
The Taliban/Al Qaeda mark themselves in a different manner, because their
customs are different. They show their beliefs through covering their
women and keeping them locked up. That is a mark one can see, just by
observing their lifestyles. They also wear the clothing (turban, etc) of
the larger I
I ran across that passage in Alma recently and marveled. I thought to
myself, "Why should this be, as the Taliban aren't known to have marked
themselves, right?" At any rate, I was somewhat awed and wondered about
the saying. I think I am storing up things to ponder in my heart.
Stacy.
At 1
Gary,
Well I guess time will tell which one of us is more correct. I would
respond in more detail but I just got back from surgery (Ouch! Where are my
pain pills?) so I hope you'll forgive me for not responding in more detail.
--
Steven Montgomery
At 09:38 AM 11/21/2002, you wrote:
Steven:
I u
Steven wrote:
>I used to believe that the "mark of the beast" certainly referred to an
>intrusive, all powerful government, which held its subjects in economic
>bondage, by forcing them to submit to some kind of microchip implant or
in
>some other manner with the number of the beast. As I've stu
>>> Gary favored us all with: >>>
>There clearly is a symbolic level to the marks. But often there
>are both physical and spiritual parts of a symbol. Babylon, for
>example, is an actual city in antiquity. It also symbolically
>represents the telestial world, built on greed and power.
>Although
Steven:
I used to believe that the "mark of the beast" certainly referred to an
intrusive, all powerful government, which held its subjects in economic
bondage, by forcing them to submit to some kind of microchip implant or
in
some other manner with the number of the beast. As I've studied
Revel
That's my understanding, except, isn't that funny? That would constitute
an empire.
Stacy.
At 12:20 PM 11/20/2002 -0700, you wrote:
At 10:15 PM 11/19/2002, you wrote:
Revelation mentions a world government, or rather a group of nations that
act as one. It is affectionately referred to as "the
At 10:15 PM 11/19/2002, you wrote:
Revelation mentions a world government, or rather a group of nations that
act as one. It is affectionately referred to as "the Beast." Those who
will not worship the Beast and have its number engraved on their
hand/head, will not be able to buy/sell (economic pre
Revelation mentions a world government, or rather a group of nations that
act as one. It is affectionately referred to as "the Beast." Those who
will not worship the Beast and have its number engraved on their
hand/head, will not be able to buy/sell (economic pressure). this would
fit in well with
At 12:39 AM 11/19/02, Stacy Smith wrote:
I vote for people, not parties.
Ditto.
Of course, sometimes the choice on the ballot seems to be between
Tweedledumb and Tweedledumber . . .
--Ronn! :)
I always knew that I would see the first man on the Moon.
I never dreamed that I would see the la
But when I look at the book of Daniel, it seems to me I remember that a
world empire wasn't to be established again until Jesus comes.
Stacy.
At 07:25 PM 11/17/2002 -0600, you wrote:
Well, I'm guessing that Canada will eventually evolve into one.
;-)
Europe and Asia seem to be going into a
I vote for people, not parties.
Stacy.
At 07:21 PM 11/17/2002 -0600, you wrote:
I believe the US government will fall eventually from bloat and
corruption. It may be that an outside attack will help it fall, but only
if the inside is rotten.
I don't have a problem with a state having an active
Well, I'm guessing that Canada will eventually evolve into one.
;-)
Europe and Asia seem to be going into a globalization realm, so I think
their nation states will eventually just be states/provinces in a giant
world-nation.
This I fear, though. It is too easy for a Hitler to step into p
I believe the US government will fall eventually from bloat and
corruption. It may be that an outside attack will help it fall, but only
if the inside is rotten.
I don't have a problem with a state having an active government. Those
who don't like it can always move. But a federal government shoul
I guess I'm referring to the next couple of years or so.
Stacy.
At 06:05 PM 11/16/2002 -0700, you wrote:
To complicate the question, one might also ask "what is the future of
nation-states in general"?
//
/// ZION LI
To complicate the question, one might also ask "what is the future of
nation-states in general"?
Stacy Smith wrote:
> What is your current belief concerning the United States? Does it need to
> be destroyed in its present form--White House, Congressional buildings,
> Pentagon, etc., as Saddam Hu
What is your current belief concerning the United States? Does it need to
be destroyed in its present form--White House, Congressional buildings,
Pentagon, etc., as Saddam Hussein and Osama Bin Laden think or should it
remain with its current governmental structural architecture? I know that
18 matches
Mail list logo
