[ZION] Good News Sources

2003-11-14 Thread John W. Redelfs
Ron, What do you feel are some of the best news sources on the Web? How about off the Web? I know that Marc Schindler continually gushed over the Economist, and truth be told, I found it a good source of news. But I still read "The New American," "Newsmax," and "Worldnet Daily" on the Web.

[ZION] Good news sources

2003-11-16 Thread Gerald Smith
I've always like Wall Street Journal's best of the web, and the Washington Times. I also recommend Matt Drudge and Neal's Nuze (www.boortz.com) for information. Neal Boortz is a libertarian radio talk show host in Atlanta, so you get some good and interesting viewpoints from him. For libertarian

Re: [ZION] Good News Sources

2003-11-14 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 05:52 PM 11/14/2003, you wrote: Ron, What do you feel are some of the best news sources on the Web? How about off the Web? I know that Marc Schindler continually gushed over the Economist, and truth be told, I found it a good source of news. But I still read "The New American," "Newsmax,"

RE: [ZION] Good News Sources

2003-11-15 Thread RB Scott
> -Original Message- > From: John W. Redelfs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 7:52 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [ZION] Good News Sources > > > Ron, > > What do you feel are some of the best news sources on the Web? How a

RE: [ZION] Good News Sources

2003-11-15 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 06:01 AM 11/15/2003, Ron Scott wrote: In my opinion, the "news"(this does not include editorialists or editorialists) organizations that are the most reliable are: 1. The New York Times group I read the New York Times with a grain of salt (Yes, I read an online version almost daily). When it

RE: [ZION] Good News Sources

2003-11-15 Thread RB Scott
Whatever. > -Original Message- > From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 10:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ZION] Good News Sources > > > At 06:01 AM 11/15/2003, Ron Scott wrote: > > > >In

RE: [ZION] Good News Sources

2003-11-15 Thread Steven Montgomery
rday, November 15, 2003 10:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ZION] Good News Sources > > > At 06:01 AM 11/15/2003, Ron Scott wrote: > > > >In my opinion, the "news"(this does not include editorialists or > >editorialists) organizations that are t

RE: [ZION] Good News Sources

2003-11-15 Thread RB Scott
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 12:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ZION] Good News Sources > > > Whatever what? Credibility does matter. But I guess that's your right to > get your news from less than credible sources. > > -- >

RE: [ZION] Good News Sources

2003-11-15 Thread Steven Montgomery
At 10:34 AM 11/15/2003, you wrote: Less credible than what, for instance? And don't give me your b.s. about ny times columnists and editorials. For the moment, I was talking ONLY about the credibility of the news organization, the fact vetting process etc. Well, certainly less credible than other

RE: [ZION] Good News Sources

2003-11-15 Thread RB Scott
> -Original Message- > From: Steven Montgomery [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2003 2:27 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [ZION] Good News Sources > > > At 10:34 AM 11/15/2003, you wrote: > >Less credible than what, for in