Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: ZODB with a Relational Database

thanks How can i know if i have my Python configured with large file support ? My version is: Zope Version (Zope 2.8.4-final, python 2.3.5, win32) Python Version 2.3.5 (#62, Feb 8 2005, 16:23:02) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] System Platform win32 thanks jose carlos - Original

[ZODB-Dev] DirectoryStorage 1.1.17

I am pleased to announce the release of DirectoryStorage, version 1.1.17. Over the last few months DirectoryStorage has been languishing at 'release candidate' status, so this is the first release badged 'stable' to include Zope 3 support (thanks to Philipp von Weitershausen), NTFS support

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: ZODB with a Relational Database

José Carlos Senciales schrieb: thanks How can i know if i have my Python configured with large file support ? My version is: Zope Version (Zope 2.8.4-final, python 2.3.5, win32) Python Version 2.3.5 (#62, Feb 8 2005, 16:23:02) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] System Platform win32

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: ZODB with a Relational Database

José Carlos Senciales schrieb: thanks my phyton console return 0L, so i have have large file support. So if you still experience problems with files 2GB, you might move to another filesystem (if moving to another OS is not an option ;) ___ For

RE: [ZODB-Dev] Re: ZODB with a Relational Database

[José Carlos Senciales] How can i know if i have my Python configured with large file support ? My version is: Zope Version (Zope 2.8.4-final, python 2.3.5, win32) Python Version 2.3.5 (#62, Feb 8 2005, 16:23:02) [MSC v.1200 32 bit (Intel)] System Platform win32 All flavors of Windows

[ZODB-Dev] Searching/wo/Zope

Hi! You have released the ZODB/ZEO as a stand alone package. But there is no stand alone searching possibility. Why? This just does not make any sense. Yous suggested and I tried Kevin Dangoor's stand alone ZCatalog. It uses the Zope source just remove the zope dependences, etc (some type of

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Searching/wo/Zope

--On 4. Januar 2006 14:38:13 -0500 Tamas Hegedus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! You have released the ZODB/ZEO as a stand alone package. But there is no stand alone searching possibility. Why? This just does not make any sense. Yous suggested and I tried Kevin Dangoor's stand alone

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Searching/wo/Zope

Using the catalog stuff from Zope 3(!) would make more sense than dealing with the Zope 2 catalog. This would be great! I think releasing and maintaining something similar would not be a big work, but would make ZODB/ZEO at much higher rank among the ODBMSs. Do you volunteer to take work on

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Searching/wo/Zope

--On 4. Januar 2006 15:11:37 -0500 Tamas Hegedus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am not a programmer. This is the source of all my problems. I just did not have the patient (and knowledge) to learn to develop zope applications. But I want to stick with Python and I need a transparent (object)

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Searching/wo/Zope

approach to get this done it to either work on the issue on your own or pay someone...this is just a question of developer resources and priorities. I do not have any finantial resources. So I have to do on my own way... Regards, Tamas -- Tamas Hegedus, PhD | phone: (1) 919-966 0329

RE: [ZODB-Dev] Searching/wo/Zope

[Tamas Hegedus] You have released the ZODB/ZEO as a stand alone package. But there is no stand alone searching possibility. Why? This just does not make any sense. It makes sense if you know why ZODB is released this way ;-) Primarily, it's so that people running Zope can install ZEO servers

RE: [ZODB-Dev] Searching/wo/Zope

[Tamas Hegedus] Please do not forget that I am not a real programmer but a consumer: That's OK -- in return, please don't forget that you're posting to a ZODB developer's list ;-). 0. I accept if the policy is making ZODB just for Zope. That's the only solid reason Zope Corp has to _pay_ for