APE doesn't work with Zope 2.8.X unless there is some version
that hasn't been released.
Bill
Dieter Maurer wrote:
José Carlos Senciales wrote at 2006-1-3 12:28 +0100:
I´m wondering if i can use ZODB without files ´Data.fs´ and use a ralational
database like Mysql to save the objects...
is
[Mihai Ilinca]
> I want to have a ClientStorage that would work in both connected and
> disconnected (to zeo-server) mode. When zeo-server is not up (or
> reachable), I would like ClientStorage to use a local cache. Is that
> possible with ZEO?
To the _extent_ possible, yes. A cache is not a data
Tim Peters wrote at 2006-1-31 01:32 -0500:
>[Chris Withers]
>> ...
>> ...oh well, if only the ZODB cache was RAM-usage-based ratehr than object
>> count based ;-)
>
>Ya, that's not feasible. More plausible would be to base ZODB cache targets
>on aggregate pickle size; ZODB _could_ know that, and t
Mihai Ilinca wrote at 2006-1-30 20:11 +0200:
> ...
>I want to have a ClientStorage that would work in both connected and
>disconnected (to zeo-server) mode. When zeo-server is not up (or reachable),
>I would like ClientStorage to use a local cache. Is that possible with ZEO?
>
>Right now I instan
Rather than chucking this in the collector as-is, it would be useful
if you could get me the output of the ZEO log rather than the output
of the client log. Right now, the actual traceback is in the ZEO
log; the client log only shows that a conflict error happened; not
where it happened.
On Tuesday 31 January 2006 11:41, Chris Withers wrote:
> Tim Peters wrote:
> >> ...base ZODB cache targets on aggregate pickle size
> All good, but still never gonna happen, right? *wry grinz*
Sounds like a reasonable evening project (Ive no chance for ZODB fun in the
day job any more), but Im s
[Chris Withers]
>>> ...
>>> ...oh well, if only the ZODB cache was RAM-usage-based ratehr than object
>>> count based ;-)
[Tim Peters]
>> Ya, that's not feasible. More plausible would be to base ZODB cache targets
>> on aggregate pickle size; ZODB _could_ know that, and then it would also be
>> s
[Andreas Jung]
> I have the following code in side a Plone app. The intent of this method is
> to perform a logging of changed Archetype fields. This code basically works
> but under some unknown circumstances I get error below where the
> transaction module seems to be None?! There is no product
Hi,
I have the following code in side a Plone app. The intent of this method is
to perform a logging of changed Archetype fields. This code basically works
but under some unknown circumstances I get error below where the
transaction module seems to be None?! There is no product refreshing
en
This is a ZODB 3.4 version of the patch I previously posted last June:
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zodb-dev/2005-June/008907.html
The following patch may be helpful to some of you for debugging. It
collects in memory information about objects when they are loaded
from the ZODB, so that when a
Tim Peters wrote:
[Chris Withers]
...
...oh well, if only the ZODB cache was RAM-usage-based ratehr than object
count based ;-)
Ya, that's not feasible. More plausible would be to base ZODB cache targets
on aggregate pickle size; ZODB _could_ know that, and then it would also be
strongly rela
11 matches
Mail list logo
