Flavio Coelho wrote:
I think it would be a good idea to update the wiki with instructions of
how to enable RelStorage for use with Standalone ZODB. I am
particularly interested in doing it. I am anxious to benchmark it
Well, let me think through what the wiki might say:
1. Download ZODB and
David Pratt wrote:
Hi Shane. Congratulations. Can you advise of compatibility with ZODB
3.8. Many thanks.
Yes, it's fully compatible now. A few tests didn't pass at first, but
they only failed due to the lack of some stub methods. After I added
those methods and created a patch that applies
Andreas Jung wrote:
You're system is appearently very slow. Tested the same myself on an
Opteron system (2.6 GHz) against a remote Postgres 8.1 DB...takes
roughly 5-6 seconds and is basically as fast a FileStorage...great!
Oops, you're right... I was running in a power saving mode. With the
Hi,
Dieter Maurer schrieb:
Christian Theune wrote at 2008-1-29 16:32 +0100:
...
When I looked up the definitions in Wikipedia about isolation and
serializability again I didn't find any hint about the conditions how to
decide which ordering is preferred.
From Wikipedia ("http://en.wikipedi
Christian Theune wrote at 2008-1-29 16:32 +0100:
> ...
>When I looked up the definitions in Wikipedia about isolation and
>serializability again I didn't find any hint about the conditions how to
>decide which ordering is preferred.
>From Wikipedia ("http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serializable_%28
On Jan 27, 2008, at 3:11 AM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Thanks for this significant contribution!
Andreas Jung wrote:
Thanks a lot for the great work!
One question: what is the ZODB patch actually doing? Is it for
optimization purposes? Is it specfic to RelStorage or does it
provide some gener
Hi Shane. Congratulations. Can you advise of compatibility with ZODB
3.8. Many thanks.
Regards,
David
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 30 January 2008, Shane Hathaway wrote:
Kudos to the PostgreSQL team for building such a nice database. :-)
I am saying this since at least 8 years now. :
On Wednesday 30 January 2008, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Kudos to the PostgreSQL team for building such a nice database. :-)
I am saying this since at least 8 years now. :-) But everyone went on the
MySQL bandwagon.
But the storage is great news! I will certainly keep this in mind for the
current
Hi,
great work! thanks!
I think it would be a good idea to update the wiki with instructions of how
to enable RelStorage for use with Standalone ZODB. I am particularly
interested in doing it. I am anxious to benchmark it too especially the
packing time
On Jan 30, 2008 6:38 AM, Shane Hat
On Jan 30, 2008 10:06 AM, Andreas Jung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> --On 30. Januar 2008 01:38:17 -0700 Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > I just committed some performance enhancements to RelStorage, then I
> > performed two simple speed comparisons with FileSt
--On 30. Januar 2008 01:38:17 -0700 Shane Hathaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi guys,
I just committed some performance enhancements to RelStorage, then I
performed two simple speed comparisons with FileStorage using a
stopwatch. I was surprised at the results.
Test #2: I measured the
Hi guys,
I just committed some performance enhancements to RelStorage, then I
performed two simple speed comparisons with FileStorage using a
stopwatch. I was surprised at the results.
Test #1: I measured the time to create a new database from scratch and
start handling requests. I did thi
12 matches
Mail list logo
