[ZODB-Dev] ANSWER to ZODB does not save transaction

2008-06-02 Thread tsmiller
ZODB group, I posted earlier concerning the fact that the ZODB was inconsistent when saving by books. I have a 'PREVIEW' option where the user can preview the book before saving. In this preview I change the database, but do not commit the transaction. ( I thought I could keep the database from

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: Ruby/Smalltalk OODB

2008-06-02 Thread Benji York
On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Tim Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I benefit from Zope and the ZODB especially. I know that I am a little > better at PR than I am at the deep technical aspects (not very good) so > I will initially gather (I already have lots of bookmarks) all the info > I can

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: Ruby/Smalltalk OODB

2008-06-02 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Tim Cook wrote: On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 15:45 +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote: Lots documentation on the ZODB is available, scattered around the web. Let's gather it into one place for starters. So, please, someone actually do something about this rotten situation? Finally? Please? Please? Reg

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: Ruby/Smalltalk OODB

2008-06-02 Thread Tim Cook
On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 15:45 +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote: > Lots documentation on the ZODB is available, scattered around the web. > Let's gather it into one place for starters. > > So, please, someone actually do something about this rotten situation? > Finally? Please? Please? > > Regards,

[ZODB-Dev] Re: Ruby/Smalltalk OODB

2008-06-02 Thread Martijn Faassen
Godefroid Chapelle wrote: Wichert Akkerman wrote: Martijn Faassen wrote: What I find interesting is that Python has had such a thing for about a decade (the ZODB), and a mostly vaporware announcement in the Ruby world makes such a splash. That's because most things Zope are not very good w

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: Ruby/Smalltalk OODB

2008-06-02 Thread Godefroid Chapelle
Wichert Akkerman wrote: Martijn Faassen wrote: What I find interesting is that Python has had such a thing for about a decade (the ZODB), and a mostly vaporware announcement in the Ruby world makes such a splash. That's because most things Zope are not very good with PR. Smart people are

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: Ruby/Smalltalk OODB

2008-06-02 Thread Martijn Faassen
Hi there, On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 3:19 PM, Wichert Akkerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martijn Faassen wrote: >> Christian Theune wrote: >>> >>> this might be interesting to ZODB users and developers: >>> http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/302177093/article.pl >> >> What I find inter

Re: [ZODB-Dev] Re: Ruby/Smalltalk OODB

2008-06-02 Thread Wichert Akkerman
Martijn Faassen wrote: Hi there, Christian Theune wrote: this might be interesting to ZODB users and developers: http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/302177093/article.pl What I find interesting is that Python has had such a thing for about a decade (the ZODB), and a mostly vaporw

[ZODB-Dev] Re: Ruby/Smalltalk OODB

2008-06-02 Thread Martijn Faassen
Hi there, Christian Theune wrote: this might be interesting to ZODB users and developers: http://rss.slashdot.org/~r/Slashdot/slashdot/~3/302177093/article.pl What I find interesting is that Python has had such a thing for about a decade (the ZODB), and a mostly vaporware announcement in the