Wichert Akkerman wrote at 2008-9-24 09:44 +0200:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'd appreciate it if people would try it out soon.
I can say that the combination of 3.8.1b8 and Dieter's
zodb-cache-size-bytes patch does not seem to work. With
zodb-cache-size-bytes set to 1 gigabyte on an instance with
On Sep 24, 2008, at 8:06 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'd appreciate it if people would try it out soon.
I can say that the combination of 3.8.1b8 and Dieter's
zodb-cache-size-bytes patch does not seem to work. With
zodb-cache-size-bytes set to
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote at 2008-9-24 09:44 +0200:
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'd appreciate it if people would try it out soon.
I can say that the combination of 3.8.1b8 and Dieter's
zodb-cache-size-bytes patch does not seem to work. With
zodb-cache-size-bytes set to 1
Jim Fulton wrote:
I'd appreciate it if people would try it out soon.
Besides the RelStorage site where we were running into problems as
mentioned in the other thread, we also use the ZODB 3.8 branch (beta8
plus the first two beta fixes) in a smaller site with blob storage for
about a week in
On Sep 30, 2008, at 1:38 PM, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote at 2008-9-19 13:45 -0400:
...
2. We (ZC) are moving to 64-bit OSs. I've resisted this for a while
due to the extra memory overhead of 64-bit pointers in Python
programs, but I've finally (too late) come around to realizing
