Anthony Gerrard wrote:
> The Relstorage pypi site recommends against using version 5.1.23 of
> MySQL because of "major bugs". As it doesn't state explicitly what
> these bugs are I can't tell whether they're fixed in the latest
> version (5.1.32). Does anyone know whether it's safe to use this
>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 09:29:07AM +0100, Chris Bainbridge wrote:
> 2009/3/31 Sandra
> >
> > For example, my computer have 1 GB RAM, could i have 2 GB objects loaded in
> > ZODB memory? I don´t well understand what is the cache in ZODB compared to
> > the RAM.
>
> A ZODB client has an in-memory
Anthony Gerrard wrote:
> OK thanks. To confirm you can have a cluster of Zope instances all
> using relstorage to connect to the same database. This negates the
> need for ZEO as the database handles the multi-threaded data access.
Yes. Nice ASCII art. :-)
Shane
__
Hi,
The Relstorage pypi site recommends against using version 5.1.23 of MySQL
because of "major bugs". As it doesn't state explicitly what these bugs are I
can't tell whether they're fixed in the latest version (5.1.32). Does anyone
know whether it's safe to use this latest version of MySQL 5
OK thanks. To confirm you can have a cluster of Zope instances all using
relstorage to connect to the same database. This negates the need for ZEO as
the database handles the multi-threaded data access.
+-+ +-+
|Zope Server 1| |Zope Server 2|
+-+ +
2009/3/31 Sandra
>
> For example, my computer have 1 GB RAM, could i have 2 GB objects loaded in
> ZODB memory? I don´t well understand what is the cache in ZODB compared to
> the RAM.
A ZODB client has an in-memory cache in RAM, and an optional on-disk
cache. The server stores lots of objects.
For example, my computer have 1 GB RAM, could i have 2 GB objects loaded in
ZODB memory? I don´t well understand what is the cache in ZODB compared to the
RAM.
don´t De: Andreas Jung
Objet: Re: [ZODB-Dev] difference between RAM and cache in ZODB
À: elsand...@yahoo.fr
Cc: zodb-dev@zope.org
Date:
