Hello,
I think we can look at this at 2 levels.
1.: As your app uses ZODB. Then this is your app's
problem/reponsibility. You use a nosql contender directly from
your app and it's your responsibility to deal with it.
2.: On the ZODB Storage level. So far I can see that level needs
co
On 11/13/2009 10:42 AM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I think we can look at this at 2 levels.
>
> 1.: As your app uses ZODB. Then this is your app's
> problem/reponsibility. You use a nosql contender directly from
> your app and it's your responsibility to deal with it.
>
> 2.: On th
>
>
>
> I suggest trying to use ZODB 3.9.3 instead. I consider blob support in
> 3.8 to be somewhat experimental.
>
Unfortunately the application having the issues is Plone 3.3. ZODB 3.9
depends on Zope 2.12 so, right? So I am afraid moving to ZODB 3.9 is not
possible in the near future.
Meanwhil
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 10:58 +0100, Christian Theune wrote:
> On 11/13/2009 10:42 AM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I think we can look at this at 2 levels.
> >
> > 1.: As your app uses ZODB. Then this is your app's
> > problem/reponsibility. You use a nosql contender directly from
>
Where can I find information on using BLOBs outside of plone? I use
ZODB directly from my python programs and I would like to store large
files across ZEO. I'm using a recent ZODB (3.9.3)
- I use runzeo.py to start my server, how do I tell it where on the
filesystem to put blob data?
- when usi
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Mikko Ohtamaa wrote:
>>
>>
>> I suggest trying to use ZODB 3.9.3 instead. I consider blob support in
>> 3.8 to be somewhat experimental.
>
> Unfortunately the application having the issues is Plone 3.3. ZODB 3.9
> depends on Zope 2.12 so, right?
ZODB does depend
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Mikko Ohtamaa
> wrote:
>> Unfortunately the application having the issues is Plone 3.3. ZODB 3.9
>> depends on Zope 2.12 so, right?
>
> ZODB does depend on Zope anything. :)
>
> Plone 3.3 may use an earlier ve
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Mikko Ohtamaa
>> wrote:
>>> Unfortunately the application having the issues is Plone 3.3. ZODB 3.9
>>> depends on Zope 2.12 so, right?
>> ZODB does depend on Zope anything. :)
>>
>>
On Friday 13 November 2009, Roché Compaan wrote:
> We had such an opportunity about 2 years ago and although the client
> never reached (and probably will never) reach the membership they
> dreamed about, they did pay us to develop a storage for members that
> could scale to more than a 100 million
Stephan Richter wrote:
> On Friday 13 November 2009, Roché Compaan wrote:
>> We had such an opportunity about 2 years ago and although the client
>> never reached (and probably will never) reach the membership they
>> dreamed about, they did pay us to develop a storage for members that
>> could sca
> I am very intrigued now to setup an EC2 cluster and install a z3c.sharding
> based solution demonstrating 100M users with some data. Mmmh...
That is the great thing about EC2. You can do massive experiments on the cheap.
Actually one of our interns is doing some work on ZODB. He is doing
most
2009/11/13 Martin Aspeli :
> Hanno Schlichting wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:18 AM, Mikko Ohtamaa
>>> wrote:
Unfortunately the application having the issues is Plone 3.3. ZODB 3.9
depends on Zope 2.12 so, right?
>>> ZODB doe
On Fri, 2009-11-13 at 13:33 -0700, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> Stephan Richter wrote:
> > On Friday 13 November 2009, Roché Compaan wrote:
> >> We had such an opportunity about 2 years ago and although the client
> >> never reached (and probably will never) reach the membership they
> >> dreamed about,
13 matches
Mail list logo
