Le jeudi 06 octobre 2011 21:18:39, Andreas Gabriel a écrit :
> Maybe this code will help as example for the shared locking problem
>
> https://svn.plone.org/svn/collective/unimr.memcachedlock/trunk/unimr/memcac
> hedlock/memcachedlock.py
I couldn't resist writing my own version inspired from your
> So accesses from different processes (or even
> different instances of the cache connector) will modify it without
> synchronisation. Supporting such setup requires using the test-and-set
> memcached operation, plus some sugar. I just don't think this was intended to
> be supported in the origin
Hi,
On 06.10.2011 19:59, Vincent Pelletier wrote:
> synchronisation. Supporting such setup requires using the test-and-set
> memcached operation, plus some sugar. I just don't think this was intended to
> be supported in the original code.
Maybe this code will help as example for the shared loc
Le mercredi 05 octobre 2011 19:45:38, Jim Fulton a écrit :
> Interesting. I'll review it.
I gave it a look.
>From what I see, I don't think this can be used by more than a single zope at
a time. My bigest hint toward this is that there is a lock on class instance
which is not visible in memcac
