On 20 Feb 2014, at 2:27 am, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Dylan Jay wrote:
>> On 19 Feb 2014, at 10:44 pm, Jim Fulton wrote:
> ...
>> yeah I figured it might be the case thats its hard to predict. In this case
>> it's catalog indexing so
On 19 Feb 2014, at 10:44 pm, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Dylan Jay wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm seeing a a ZCatalog reindex of a large number of objects take a long
>> time while only using 10% cpu. I'm not sure yet if this is d
ol I didn't see a way for code such
as the ZCatalog to give a hint to ZEO as to what they wanted to load next so
the time is taken by network delays rather than either ZEO or app. Is that the
case?
I'm guessing if it is, it's a fundamental design problem that can't be fixed :
In some ways the ZODB is less flexible. It requires you to understand more
about how you will access the data before you import it, than does an SQL
database. This is because the datastructure defines how you can query it in a
ZODB.
For example, if you need multiple indexes to your data, then t
<- 406.4706.478 transformer.py:24(__call__)
{method 'query' of '_mysql.connection' objects}
<- 1483.6613.661 cursors.py:277(_do_query)
...
The page itself is just a normal page, no writes involve
Hi,
My colleague is having the issue outlined below. I thought this list might be
better to give an insight as to what is going on?
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Adam Terrey
> Subject: Fwd: Zope/Plone/Zeo Concurrency Issue
> Date: 28 May 2013 5:23:33 PM AEST
> T
On 18/12/2012, at 2:15 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Dylan Jay wrote:
>>
>> On 14/12/2012, at 8:32 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Dylan Jay wrote:
>>> ...
On 14/12/2012, at 8:32 AM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Dylan Jay wrote:
> ...
>> I'd never considered that the cache was attached to the db connection rather
>> than the thread. I just reread
>> http://docs.zope.org/zope2/zope2book/Mai
On 13/12/2012, at 11:07 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Dylan Jay wrote:
Hi,
I've been working with zope for over 12 years and something that
keeps coming up is sacling IO bound operations in Zope. The typical
example is where you build an app that calls ext
Hi,
I've been working with zope for over 12 years and something that keeps coming
up is sacling IO bound operations in Zope. The typical example is where you
build an app that calls external apis. While this is happening a zope thread
isn't doing any other processing and because there is a 1 th
On 16/05/2012, at 3:24 AM, Alan Runyan wrote:
Windows 2008 server standard. Python 2.6/2.7
I'm not sure. I think living without clustering and memcached for
the moment
is fine.
I would agree.
And what about blob storage? Are blobs inside the DB in little
chunks
enough, do you want them
On 09/05/2012, at 11:26 AM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On 09.05.2012, at 02:34, Dylan Jay wrote:
I know it's not all about money but if we were to sponsor
development of microsoft sql server support for relstorage, is
there someone who knows how and has an estimated cost and available
Hi,
Previous threads on this subject didn't seem to go anywhere.
I know it's not all about money but if we were to sponsor development
of microsoft sql server support for relstorage, is there someone who
knows how and has an estimated cost and available time?
---
Dylan Jay
Sorry for the confusion
It is a buildout feature to make your variable substitutions which is
what Ive done there.
Replicas are for redundant MySQL servers. I doubt you need that. Just
check the relstorage docs to see what options you need.
Dylan Jay
Technical solution manager
PretaWeb 99552830
shared-blob-dir off
replica-conf ${mysql-hosts:output}
db blah
user blah
passwd blah
---
Dylan Jay
Technical Solutions Manager
PretaWeb: Multisite Performance Support
Dylan Jay
Technical solution manager
PretaWeb 99552830
On 08/12/2010, at 11:28 PM, Jim Fulton wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Malthe Borch wrote:
>> Currently, when a thread loads a non-ghost into its object cache, its
>> straight from being unpickled. That means that
tion is abandoned.
---
Is there any good reason not to retry connecting?
---
Dylan Jay
Plone Solutions Manager. www.pretaweb.com
P +612 80819071 M +61421477460
skype - dylan_jaytwitter - djay75
___
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB
Chris Withers wrote:
the main db and created a new one and remounted the other two. Luckly
nothing was in the main db except the mount points.
Then why are you using mounted dbs?
I have seperate plone sites in each mounted db. This lets me move them
between servers, or between production an
Chris Withers wrote:
Dylan Jay wrote:
I have a few databases being served out of a zeo. I restarted them in
a routine operation and now I can't restart due to the following error
Do you use cross database references?
not to my knowledge. I had 1 main db and 2 mounted db's which
hi,
I have a few databases being served out of a zeo. I restarted them in a
routine operation and now I can't restart due to the following error
Any idea on how to fix this?
2008-03-10 06:29:12 ERROR ZODB.Connection Couldn't load state for 0x01
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/ho
growing and shrinking
like in the latest zope?
--
Dylan Jay
---
___
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
mised.
--
Dylan Jay
___
For more information about ZODB, see the ZODB Wiki:
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/ZODB/
ZODB-Dev mailing list - ZODB-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zodb-dev
22 matches
Mail list logo
