Hi all,
Recently I was appointed to improve a Plone's performance, and I have
the following issue:
I see too many transactions made by the anonymous user. I can reproduce
this behaviour: just watching the home page produces a transaction at
/index by None.
I wonder if there's a way to actually s
On Apr 5, 2008, at 11:49 AM, Manuel Vazquez Acosta wrote:
Hi all,
Recently I was appointed to improve a Plone's performance, and I have
the following issue:
I see too many transactions made by the anonymous user. I can
reproduce
this behaviour: just watching the home page produces a transac
> In a development environment, set a breakpoint (e.g. add "import pdb;
> pdb.set_trace()" in ZODB.Connection.Connection.register.
>
> You'll be able to see exactly what is causing object changes. I
> recommend doing this in the zope debugger, which makes it easy to run
> one request at a time.
On Apr 5, 2008, at 12:09 PM, Manuel Vazquez Acosta wrote:
In a development environment, set a breakpoint (e.g. add "import pdb;
pdb.set_trace()" in ZODB.Connection.Connection.register.
You'll be able to see exactly what is causing object changes. I
recommend doing this in the zope debugger, wh
Manuel Vazquez Acosta wrote at 2008-4-5 11:49 -0400:
> ...
>I wonder if there's a way to actually see what objects (or object types)
>are modified by those transactions. So I can go directly to the source
>of the (surely innecesary) transaction.
The ZODB utility "fsdump" generates a human readable
Here is something more ZODB and less Zope related (kinda).
I was talking with Benji a few weeks ago about a problem that should
be easy to debug but was not. Here is the scenerio:
- Customer has software on a remote machine. They are seeing
unnecessary transaction commits. Just like the gu
Here is something more ZODB and less Zope related (kinda).
I was talking with Benji a few weeks ago about a problem that should
be easy to debug but was not. Here is the scenerio:
- Customer has software on a remote machine. They are seeing
unnecessary transaction commits. Just like the
Hello Alan,
Sunday, April 6, 2008, 12:30:21 AM, you wrote:
AR> Question: Is it possible for ZODB 3.9 to have a pure python
AR> implementation of persistent.Persistent? Maybe this would be a good
AR> ZODB GSOC project?
That would give some help to the "Zope 3 components on Jython" project
too ;
On Apr 5, 2008, at 6:30 PM, Alan Runyan wrote:
Here is something more ZODB and less Zope related (kinda).
I was talking with Benji a few weeks ago about a problem that should
be easy to debug but was not. Here is the scenerio:
- Customer has software on a remote machine. They are seeing
un
Alan Runyan wrote:
>
> - Customer has software on a remote machine. They are seeing
> unnecessary transaction commits. Just like the guy 'Analyzing a ZODB'.
I'm that guy ;).
BTW, we have related those unnecessary commits to CMFQuestions, an old
plone product now superseded by PloneSurveys.
10 matches
Mail list logo
