On 07/13/2012 02:42 PM, Santi Camps wrote:
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Shane Hathaway mailto:sh...@hathawaymix.org>> wrote:
On 07/12/2012 01:30 PM, Santi Camps wrote:
My specific question is: if I disable pack-gc, can I safety empty
object_ref table and free this space?
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Shane Hathaway wrote:
> On 07/12/2012 01:30 PM, Santi Camps wrote:
>
>> My specific question is: if I disable pack-gc, can I safety empty
>> object_ref table and free this space?
>>
>
> Certainly. However, most of the 23 GB probably consists of blobs; blobs
> are
On 07/12/2012 01:30 PM, Santi Camps wrote:
My specific question is: if I disable pack-gc, can I safety empty
object_ref table and free this space?
Certainly. However, most of the 23 GB probably consists of blobs; blobs
are not shown in the query results you posted.
Shane
___
Hi
I've been using relstorage for years in production environments and it's
really amazing, zero big problems. However, I have now some big databases.
I'm examining one of them, 23 GB in total, postgresql 8.3 and RelStorage
1.5.1 and I see that biggest objects are objects_ref and it's index:
