Re: [ZODB-Dev] problems w/ Pickle based deep-copy of Blob objects

2008-09-24 Thread Andreas Zeidler
On Thu, 11 Sep 2008 21:20:51 +0200, Rob Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shane Hathaway wrote: >> Rob Miller wrote: >>> i'm assuming from the lack of response that nobody has a problem w/ >>> this >>> change... if i don't hear differently within the next 24 hours or so, >>> i'll >>> commit t

Re: [ZODB-Dev] problems w/ Pickle based deep-copy of Blob objects

2008-09-22 Thread Christian Theune
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 13:19 -0700, Rob Miller wrote: > Christian Theune wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 12:05 -0700, Rob Miller wrote: > >> hi all, > >> > >> i've been experimenting w/ getting ZODB 3.8's blob storage support to work > >> w/ > >> the openplans.org stack, and have hit a snag about

Re: [ZODB-Dev] problems w/ Pickle based deep-copy of Blob objects

2008-09-15 Thread Rob Miller
Christian Theune wrote: > On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 12:05 -0700, Rob Miller wrote: >> hi all, >> >> i've been experimenting w/ getting ZODB 3.8's blob storage support to work >> w/ >> the openplans.org stack, and have hit a snag about which i could use some >> feedback. > > There's another bug arou

Re: [ZODB-Dev] problems w/ Pickle based deep-copy of Blob objects

2008-09-13 Thread Christian Theune
On Tue, 2008-08-19 at 12:05 -0700, Rob Miller wrote: > hi all, > > i've been experimenting w/ getting ZODB 3.8's blob storage support to work w/ > the openplans.org stack, and have hit a snag about which i could use some > feedback. There's another bug around the corner: If CMFEditions causes

Re: [ZODB-Dev] problems w/ Pickle based deep-copy of Blob objects

2008-09-11 Thread Shane Hathaway
Rob Miller wrote: > Shane Hathaway wrote: >> You should also add a test that currently fails, but passes with your >> change; that's the best way to ensure it won't break again. I recognize >> that may be fairly difficult, but there are a lot of people here who >> will answer questions. > > no

Re: [ZODB-Dev] problems w/ Pickle based deep-copy of Blob objects

2008-09-11 Thread Rob Miller
Shane Hathaway wrote: > Rob Miller wrote: >> i'm assuming from the lack of response that nobody has a problem w/ this >> change... if i don't hear differently within the next 24 hours or so, i'll >> commit the change to the 3.8 branch and the trunk. > > The change looks harmless, but please veri

Re: [ZODB-Dev] problems w/ Pickle based deep-copy of Blob objects

2008-09-10 Thread Shane Hathaway
Rob Miller wrote: > i'm assuming from the lack of response that nobody has a problem w/ this > change... if i don't hear differently within the next 24 hours or so, i'll > commit the change to the 3.8 branch and the trunk. The change looks harmless, but please verify it passes the ZODB tests. Y

Re: [ZODB-Dev] problems w/ Pickle based deep-copy of Blob objects

2008-09-10 Thread Rob Miller
i'm assuming from the lack of response that nobody has a problem w/ this change... if i don't hear differently within the next 24 hours or so, i'll commit the change to the 3.8 branch and the trunk. here's the patch: Index: src/ZODB/blob.py ==

[ZODB-Dev] problems w/ Pickle based deep-copy of Blob objects

2008-08-19 Thread Rob Miller
hi all, i've been experimenting w/ getting ZODB 3.8's blob storage support to work w/ the openplans.org stack, and have hit a snag about which i could use some feedback. the problem is that CMFEditions, which we use to version our content, uses Pickler.dump() and Unpickler.load() to create dee